×




Manish Enterprises: A Growth Versus Profitability Dilemma Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Manish Enterprises: A Growth Versus Profitability Dilemma case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Manish Enterprises: A Growth Versus Profitability Dilemma case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Shelly Singhal, Shailendra Kumar Rai. The Manish Enterprises: A Growth Versus Profitability Dilemma (referred as “Manish Enterprises” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Manish Enterprises: A Growth Versus Profitability Dilemma Case Study


In 2012, Manish Enterprises, a leading coal supplier firm located in Ludhiana, India, was facing a decline in growth. A year later, a business graduate was appointed as the chief executive officer of the company. He managed to reduce the cash cycle from six months to three months by running the operations of the firm efficiently. Sales increased by 127 per cent, and the firm began financing its growth by taking advances from customers. The firm was thus able to reduce its investment in current assets. However, despite adopting best practices, the profitability of the business was declining. The challenges then faced by Manish Enterprises were to manage growth and liquidity while retaining profitability. The authors are affiliated with Management Development Institute.


Case Authors : Shelly Singhal, Shailendra Kumar Rai

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Mergers & acquisitions




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Manish Enterprises: A Growth Versus Profitability Dilemma Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011923) -10011923 - -
Year 1 3466689 -6545234 3466689 0.9434 3270461
Year 2 3969867 -2575367 7436556 0.89 3533167
Year 3 3942029 1366662 11378585 0.8396 3309804
Year 4 3246723 4613385 14625308 0.7921 2571709
TOTAL 14625308 12685141




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2673218

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Manish Enterprises shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Manish Enterprises have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Manish Enterprises: A Growth Versus Profitability Dilemma

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Manish Enterprises often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Manish Enterprises needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011923) -10011923 - -
Year 1 3466689 -6545234 3466689 0.8696 3014512
Year 2 3969867 -2575367 7436556 0.7561 3001790
Year 3 3942029 1366662 11378585 0.6575 2591948
Year 4 3246723 4613385 14625308 0.5718 1856324
TOTAL 10464574


The Net NPV after 4 years is 452651

(10464574 - 10011923 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011923) -10011923 - -
Year 1 3466689 -6545234 3466689 0.8333 2888908
Year 2 3969867 -2575367 7436556 0.6944 2756852
Year 3 3942029 1366662 11378585 0.5787 2281267
Year 4 3246723 4613385 14625308 0.4823 1565742
TOTAL 9492769


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519154

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9492769 - 10011923 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Manish Enterprises to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Manish Enterprises has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Manish Enterprises can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Manish Enterprises, then the stock price of the Manish Enterprises should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Manish Enterprises should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Manish Enterprises: A Growth Versus Profitability Dilemma

References & Further Readings

Shelly Singhal, Shailendra Kumar Rai (2018), "Manish Enterprises: A Growth Versus Profitability Dilemma Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


San-Ai Oil SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Dataprep SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Ancora Indonesia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Seohee Construction SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Cgrowth Capital Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Miscellaneous)


Yamabiko Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Gecina SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations