×




Earth's General Store: Balancing People, Planet, and Profit in Organic-Food Retailing Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Earth's General Store: Balancing People, Planet, and Profit in Organic-Food Retailing case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Earth's General Store: Balancing People, Planet, and Profit in Organic-Food Retailing case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ashton Paulitsch, Maninder Pardais, Bernard Streeper, Brian Ballman. The Earth's General Store: Balancing People, Planet, and Profit in Organic-Food Retailing (referred as “Downtown Earth's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Earth's General Store: Balancing People, Planet, and Profit in Organic-Food Retailing Case Study


The owner and operator of two stores that sold organic groceries and fair-trade goods in Edmonton, Alberta was proud of what he had built; however he was worried about the financial sustainability of his downtown location. Since its opening in 2014, the downtown store had constantly struggled to remain profitable in the face of extremely high overhead costs. The original Whyte Avenue location of Earth's General Store, highly popular with its loyal patrons, had been subsidizing the downtown store just to keep its doors open. This practice was certainly not a long-term solution, and in early 2016, the owner needed to create a new business strategy that would balance his company's financial needs with its social and environmental missions. The authors Ashton Paulitsch, Maninder Pardais, Bernard Streeper, Brian Ballman, Taylor Love, and Joel Gehman are affiliated with University of Alberta.


Case Authors : Ashton Paulitsch, Maninder Pardais, Bernard Streeper, Brian Ballman

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Sustainability




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Earth's General Store: Balancing People, Planet, and Profit in Organic-Food Retailing Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027426) -10027426 - -
Year 1 3462916 -6564510 3462916 0.9434 3266902
Year 2 3970589 -2593921 7433505 0.89 3533810
Year 3 3946303 1352382 11379808 0.8396 3313392
Year 4 3239277 4591659 14619085 0.7921 2565811
TOTAL 14619085 12679915




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2652489

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Downtown Earth's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Downtown Earth's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Earth's General Store: Balancing People, Planet, and Profit in Organic-Food Retailing

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Downtown Earth's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Downtown Earth's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027426) -10027426 - -
Year 1 3462916 -6564510 3462916 0.8696 3011231
Year 2 3970589 -2593921 7433505 0.7561 3002336
Year 3 3946303 1352382 11379808 0.6575 2594758
Year 4 3239277 4591659 14619085 0.5718 1852067
TOTAL 10460392


The Net NPV after 4 years is 432966

(10460392 - 10027426 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027426) -10027426 - -
Year 1 3462916 -6564510 3462916 0.8333 2885763
Year 2 3970589 -2593921 7433505 0.6944 2757353
Year 3 3946303 1352382 11379808 0.5787 2283740
Year 4 3239277 4591659 14619085 0.4823 1562151
TOTAL 9489008


The Net NPV after 4 years is -538418

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489008 - 10027426 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Downtown Earth's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Downtown Earth's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Downtown Earth's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Downtown Earth's, then the stock price of the Downtown Earth's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Downtown Earth's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Earth's General Store: Balancing People, Planet, and Profit in Organic-Food Retailing

References & Further Readings

Ashton Paulitsch, Maninder Pardais, Bernard Streeper, Brian Ballman (2018), "Earth's General Store: Balancing People, Planet, and Profit in Organic-Food Retailing Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Minerals Technologies SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Eiffage SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


SenesTech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Man King SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Netlist SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Ontsu SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Grocery)


Sarine Technologies Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Telenor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Agora Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


Hugel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Seah Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel


Ikuyo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts