Balancing the Trade-Offs Between Competition and Stability: Private Banks & Public Policy Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Balancing the Trade-Offs Between Competition and Stability: Private Banks & Public Policy case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Balancing the Trade-Offs Between Competition and Stability: Private Banks & Public Policy case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Xavier Vives. The Balancing the Trade-Offs Between Competition and Stability: Private Banks & Public Policy (referred as “Competition Stability” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Balancing the Trade-Offs Between Competition and Stability: Private Banks & Public Policy Case Study

Does too much competition in banking hurt society? What policies can best protect and stabilize banking without stifling it? This article addresses the critical relationships between competition, regulation and stability, and the implications of coordinating banking regulations with competition policies. The author presents some key challenges that bankers and regulators face in trying to manage the trade-offs between competition and stability. He also derives some important policy implications for both public- and private-sector actors, so that society can reap the genuine benefits of competition: efficiency, innovation, growth and consumer welfare, in order to build trust in the banking sector again.

Case Authors : Xavier Vives

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Financial management

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Balancing the Trade-Offs Between Competition and Stability: Private Banks & Public Policy Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10017298)	-10017298	-	-
Year 1	3471168	-6546130	3471168	0.9434	3274687
Year 2	3973531	-2572599	7444699	0.89	3536428
Year 3	3951990	1379391	11396689	0.8396	3318167
Year 4	3246814	4626205	14643503	0.7921	2571781
TOTAL			14643503		12701063

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2683765

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Competition Stability shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Competition Stability have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Balancing the Trade-Offs Between Competition and Stability: Private Banks & Public Policy

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Competition Stability often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Competition Stability needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10017298)	-10017298	-	-
Year 1	3471168	-6546130	3471168	0.8696	3018407
Year 2	3973531	-2572599	7444699	0.7561	3004560
Year 3	3951990	1379391	11396689	0.6575	2598498
Year 4	3246814	4626205	14643503	0.5718	1856376
TOTAL					10477841

The Net NPV after 4 years is 460543

(10477841 - 10017298 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10017298)	-10017298	-	-
Year 1	3471168	-6546130	3471168	0.8333	2892640
Year 2	3973531	-2572599	7444699	0.6944	2759397
Year 3	3951990	1379391	11396689	0.5787	2287031
Year 4	3246814	4626205	14643503	0.4823	1565786
TOTAL					9504854

The Net NPV after 4 years is -512444

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9504854 - 10017298 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Competition Stability to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Competition Stability has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Competition Stability can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Competition Stability, then the stock price of the Competition Stability should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Competition Stability should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Balancing the Trade-Offs Between Competition and Stability: Private Banks & Public Policy

References & Further Readings

Xavier Vives (2018), "Balancing the Trade-Offs Between Competition and Stability: Private Banks & Public Policy Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.