×




Harvard Men's Soccer Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Harvard Men's Soccer case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Harvard Men's Soccer case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Alison Wood Brooks, Katherine Coffman. The Harvard Men's Soccer (referred as “Soccer Harvard” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Organizational culture, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Harvard Men's Soccer Case Study


It was a cool fall morning in October 2016 and Harvard University Athletic Director Robert Scalise was considering what to say, if anything. He had just received an email about a document written more than four years earlier by the 2012 Harvard Men's Soccer Team (created in the summer of 2012). The document-created in Google and titled the "scouting report"-contained lewd, sexually-explicit comments about the 2012 Harvard Women's Soccer recruits (the incoming freshmen women who, in Fall 2012, matriculated at Harvard and began playing on the soccer team). Based on the historical data contained in the document, it appeared that the "scouting report" was an annual practice for the Harvard Men's Soccer team.1 Harvard's undergraduate newspaper, The Crimson, was about to break the story, revealing the document's existence, and Scalise had been asked for a comment.


Case Authors : Alison Wood Brooks, Katherine Coffman

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Organizational culture, Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Harvard Men's Soccer Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007579) -10007579 - -
Year 1 3449625 -6557954 3449625 0.9434 3254363
Year 2 3982549 -2575405 7432174 0.89 3544454
Year 3 3951401 1375996 11383575 0.8396 3317672
Year 4 3224660 4600656 14608235 0.7921 2554233
TOTAL 14608235 12670723




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2663144

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Soccer Harvard have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Soccer Harvard shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Harvard Men's Soccer

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Soccer Harvard often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Soccer Harvard needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007579) -10007579 - -
Year 1 3449625 -6557954 3449625 0.8696 2999674
Year 2 3982549 -2575405 7432174 0.7561 3011379
Year 3 3951401 1375996 11383575 0.6575 2598110
Year 4 3224660 4600656 14608235 0.5718 1843710
TOTAL 10452873


The Net NPV after 4 years is 445294

(10452873 - 10007579 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007579) -10007579 - -
Year 1 3449625 -6557954 3449625 0.8333 2874688
Year 2 3982549 -2575405 7432174 0.6944 2765659
Year 3 3951401 1375996 11383575 0.5787 2286690
Year 4 3224660 4600656 14608235 0.4823 1555102
TOTAL 9482139


The Net NPV after 4 years is -525440

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9482139 - 10007579 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Soccer Harvard to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Soccer Harvard has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Soccer Harvard can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Soccer Harvard, then the stock price of the Soccer Harvard should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Soccer Harvard should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Harvard Men's Soccer

References & Further Readings

Alison Wood Brooks, Katherine Coffman (2018), "Harvard Men's Soccer Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Swift Networks SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Qinghaihuading SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Bilfinger SE SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Anhui Ankai A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


China Jushi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Mountain Province Diamonds SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Non-Metallic Mining


Advanced A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Centrus Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Cheetah Canyon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Spectrascience New SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


YTL Hospitality REIT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations