Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?
At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Trouble With Corporate Compliance Programs case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Todd Haugh. The The Trouble With Corporate Compliance Programs (referred as “Compliance Unethical” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .
The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.
Multinational corporations spend millions of dollars per year on compliance. In highly regulated industries, such as health care and finance, large companies spend much more, sometimes hiring hundreds or even thousands of compliance officers at a time. There is often a belief on the part of corporate leaders that when rigorous compliance programs are in place, employee wrongdoing will largely disappear.If something does go wrong, the hope is that having a comprehensive program will help convince regulators that the company's compliance initiatives were "effective,"the standard used in U.S. sentencing guidelines. Unfortunately, even today's most comprehensive programs won't curtail corporate wrongdoing or the government intervention that follows. Volkswagen AG's compliance program didn't stop its employees from installing "defeat device"software to cheat emissions tests, nor did Wells Fargo & Co.'s policies prevent its employees from opening new customer accounts without authorization. More than 15 years after the Enron Corp. scandal, most companies know very little about how employees make ethical decisions or the psychological mechanisms that cause them to perform unethical and illegal acts. Even fewer have compliance strategies aimed at curbing such behaviors. The goal of this article is to pull together the burgeoning field of behavioral ethics, which provides insight into how individuals make ethical decisions, with the work of criminologists who study individual and corporate criminality. The author seeks to explain why corporate compliance efforts are falling short and how those efforts can be improved. In addition, he offers practical and cost-effective strategies for improving compliance programs that focus on employee behavior, which he says is the best way to make compliance truly effective. Corporate compliance depends on the behavior of individual employees. If employees, officers, and managers always acted in a law-abiding and ethical manner, compliance failures would rarely occur. But that is not realistic. That is why companies need to be aware of how and why employees act the way they do. This starts with understanding how people make decisions generally and how that translates to ethical decision-making. The article describes eight common rationalizations used by those committing unethical and illegal acts within companies. Corporate leaders need to understand these rationalizations and be able to identify their usage as part of an effective compliance program. The author acknowledges that no compliance program will entirely eliminate bad employee conduct. But behaviorally cognizant programs, ones that seek to understand employee decision-making and target the cognitive mechanisms that foster unethicality, hold the promise of reducing unethical and illegal behavior within a company.
| Years | Cash Flow | Net Cash Flow | Cumulative Cash Flow |
Discount Rate @ 6 % |
Discounted Cash Flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 0 | (10006575) | -10006575 | - | - | |
| Year 1 | 3449242 | -6557333 | 3449242 | 0.9434 | 3254002 |
| Year 2 | 3979720 | -2577613 | 7428962 | 0.89 | 3541937 |
| Year 3 | 3940765 | 1363152 | 11369727 | 0.8396 | 3308742 |
| Year 4 | 3247723 | 4610875 | 14617450 | 0.7921 | 2572501 |
| TOTAL | 14617450 | 12677182 |
In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -
Capital Budgeting Approaches
There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –
1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index
Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on
Discounted Cash Flow
technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.
Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –
1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Compliance Unethical have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Compliance Unethical shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0
Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate.
Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.
Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project
In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Compliance Unethical often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.
To overcome such scenarios managers at Compliance Unethical needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.
After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.
| Years | Cash Flow | Net Cash Flow | Cumulative Cash Flow |
Discount Rate @ 15 % |
Discounted Cash Flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 0 | (10006575) | -10006575 | - | - | |
| Year 1 | 3449242 | -6557333 | 3449242 | 0.8696 | 2999341 |
| Year 2 | 3979720 | -2577613 | 7428962 | 0.7561 | 3009240 |
| Year 3 | 3940765 | 1363152 | 11369727 | 0.6575 | 2591117 |
| Year 4 | 3247723 | 4610875 | 14617450 | 0.5718 | 1856896 |
| TOTAL | 10456594 |
(10456594 - 10006575 )
If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.
| Years | Cash Flow | Net Cash Flow | Cumulative Cash Flow |
Discount Rate @ 20 % |
Discounted Cash Flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 0 | (10006575) | -10006575 | - | - | |
| Year 1 | 3449242 | -6557333 | 3449242 | 0.8333 | 2874368 |
| Year 2 | 3979720 | -2577613 | 7428962 | 0.6944 | 2763694 |
| Year 3 | 3940765 | 1363152 | 11369727 | 0.5787 | 2280535 |
| Year 4 | 3247723 | 4610875 | 14617450 | 0.4823 | 1566224 |
| TOTAL | 9484823 |
At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9484823 - 10006575 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Compliance Unethical to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.
Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Compliance Unethical has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Compliance Unethical can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.
In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Compliance Unethical, then the stock price of the Compliance Unethical should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.
In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.
Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Compliance Unethical should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –
Understanding of risks involved in the project.
What can impact the cash flow of the project.
What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.
What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.
What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.
Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.
Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.
Todd Haugh (2018), "The Trouble With Corporate Compliance Programs Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.
Feel free to connect with us if you need business research.
You can download Excel Template of Case Study Solution & Analysis of The Trouble With Corporate Compliance Programs
Financial , Investment Services
Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts
Capital Goods , Construction Services
Financial , Regional Banks
Technology , Computer Services
Basic Materials , Metal Mining
Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers
Basic Materials , Iron & Steel
Energy , Oil & Gas Operations
Financial , Regional Banks
Services , Real Estate Operations
Transportation , Airline
