×




Uni-President: Crisis Management Strategy Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Uni-President: Crisis Management Strategy case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Uni-President: Crisis Management Strategy case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Huei-Mei Liang, Ting Yu, Chung-Cheng Tu. The Uni-President: Crisis Management Strategy (referred as “Uni Food” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Manufacturing, Product development.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Uni-President: Crisis Management Strategy Case Study


On January 16, 2015, the director of the public affairs division of Uni-President Enterprises Corp. (Uni-President) reflected on growing safety concerns in the food industry. At the time, organizations operated in an uncertain environment, marked by varied suppliers of raw materials, changing government policies and regulations, and shifting consumption choices. As business environments grew ever more uncertain, the likelihood of a product crisis increased. The food industry was especially vulnerable, and large food manufacturers confronted difficult situations in which their hard-won reputations could be destroyed by a single crisis. Even with its strong track record and reputation, Uni-President could not have avoided the consequences of a 2014 food scandal. Although Uni-President had survived the recent spate of food safety crises, more would be likely to come. Was Uni-President's crisis management approach sufficient, appropriate, and effective? What should Uni-President do going forward? Ting Yu is affiliated with University of New South Wales.


Case Authors : Huei-Mei Liang, Ting Yu, Chung-Cheng Tu

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Manufacturing, Product development




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Uni-President: Crisis Management Strategy Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005013) -10005013 - -
Year 1 3463967 -6541046 3463967 0.9434 3267893
Year 2 3978447 -2562599 7442414 0.89 3540804
Year 3 3943447 1380848 11385861 0.8396 3310994
Year 4 3243488 4624336 14629349 0.7921 2569146
TOTAL 14629349 12688837




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2683824

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Uni Food have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Uni Food shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Uni-President: Crisis Management Strategy

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Uni Food often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Uni Food needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005013) -10005013 - -
Year 1 3463967 -6541046 3463967 0.8696 3012145
Year 2 3978447 -2562599 7442414 0.7561 3008278
Year 3 3943447 1380848 11385861 0.6575 2592880
Year 4 3243488 4624336 14629349 0.5718 1854475
TOTAL 10467778


The Net NPV after 4 years is 462765

(10467778 - 10005013 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005013) -10005013 - -
Year 1 3463967 -6541046 3463967 0.8333 2886639
Year 2 3978447 -2562599 7442414 0.6944 2762810
Year 3 3943447 1380848 11385861 0.5787 2282087
Year 4 3243488 4624336 14629349 0.4823 1564182
TOTAL 9495719


The Net NPV after 4 years is -509294

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9495719 - 10005013 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Uni Food to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Uni Food has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Uni Food can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Uni Food, then the stock price of the Uni Food should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Uni Food should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Uni-President: Crisis Management Strategy

References & Further Readings

Huei-Mei Liang, Ting Yu, Chung-Cheng Tu (2018), "Uni-President: Crisis Management Strategy Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Nusantara Pelabuhan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Dgenx SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Giken SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Coreana Cosmetics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Pado SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


Custodian Reit SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Royal Deluxe SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Imarketkorea SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Catalog & Mail Order)


V I P Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


HealthStream SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Focus Graphite SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Non-Metallic Mining