×




How to Manage Crowdsourcing Platforms Effectively? Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for How to Manage Crowdsourcing Platforms Effectively? case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. How to Manage Crowdsourcing Platforms Effectively? case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ivo Blohm, Shkodran Zogaj, Ulrich Bretschneider, Jan Marco Leimeister. The How to Manage Crowdsourcing Platforms Effectively? (referred as “Crowdsourcing Mechanisms” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Collaboration, Corporate governance, Innovation, Internet, IT.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of How to Manage Crowdsourcing Platforms Effectively? Case Study


To profit from crowdsourcing, organizations can engage in four different approaches: microtasking, information pooling, broadcast search, and open collaboration. This article presents 21 governance mechanisms that can help organizations manage their crowdsourcing platforms. It investigates the effectiveness of these governance mechanisms in 19 case studies and recommends specific configurations of these mechanisms for each of the four crowdsourcing approaches. Also, it offers guidance to organizations that host a crowdsourcing platform by providing recommendations for implementing governance mechanisms into their platforms and building up governance capabilities for crowdsourcing.


Case Authors : Ivo Blohm, Shkodran Zogaj, Ulrich Bretschneider, Jan Marco Leimeister

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Collaboration, Corporate governance, Innovation, Internet, IT




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for How to Manage Crowdsourcing Platforms Effectively? Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029924) -10029924 - -
Year 1 3467857 -6562067 3467857 0.9434 3271563
Year 2 3955682 -2606385 7423539 0.89 3520543
Year 3 3961916 1355531 11385455 0.8396 3326501
Year 4 3250519 4606050 14635974 0.7921 2574716
TOTAL 14635974 12693323




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2663399

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Crowdsourcing Mechanisms shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Crowdsourcing Mechanisms have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of How to Manage Crowdsourcing Platforms Effectively?

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Crowdsourcing Mechanisms often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Crowdsourcing Mechanisms needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029924) -10029924 - -
Year 1 3467857 -6562067 3467857 0.8696 3015528
Year 2 3955682 -2606385 7423539 0.7561 2991064
Year 3 3961916 1355531 11385455 0.6575 2605024
Year 4 3250519 4606050 14635974 0.5718 1858495
TOTAL 10470111


The Net NPV after 4 years is 440187

(10470111 - 10029924 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029924) -10029924 - -
Year 1 3467857 -6562067 3467857 0.8333 2889881
Year 2 3955682 -2606385 7423539 0.6944 2747001
Year 3 3961916 1355531 11385455 0.5787 2292775
Year 4 3250519 4606050 14635974 0.4823 1567573
TOTAL 9497231


The Net NPV after 4 years is -532693

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9497231 - 10029924 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Crowdsourcing Mechanisms to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Crowdsourcing Mechanisms has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Crowdsourcing Mechanisms can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Crowdsourcing Mechanisms, then the stock price of the Crowdsourcing Mechanisms should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Crowdsourcing Mechanisms should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of How to Manage Crowdsourcing Platforms Effectively?

References & Further Readings

Ivo Blohm, Shkodran Zogaj, Ulrich Bretschneider, Jan Marco Leimeister (2018), "How to Manage Crowdsourcing Platforms Effectively? Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Keryx SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Cerillion SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Yantian Port A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Hyundai Mobis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Watchstone Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Ocean Bridge SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Kainos Laboratories SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Monster Beverage SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Nonalcoholic)


Benchmark Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock


OncoCyte SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Samse SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Home Improvement)