×




Improving a Hockey Team Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Improving a Hockey Team case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Improving a Hockey Team case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Hubert Pun, Josh Weinstein. The Improving a Hockey Team (referred as “Fan Favourite” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Improving a Hockey Team Case Study


In November 2017, a fan of hockey watched his favourite team lose 6-4 against a contending team. After a great start to the season with a record of 6 wins and 1 loss, his favourite team had lost 6 of the last 8 games, dropping their record to 8 wins and 7 losses. The fan knew that the time was approaching for the inevitable discussions with his friends regarding the team's success. Which players should they have signed? Which player should the team trade for? What line combinations would serve the team best? Who was overvalued, and who was undervalued? Knowing that conversations among his friends typically took on a random and unstructured format, the fan planned to provide a more analytical approach to the discussion this year. His research would raise the level of the conversation and help back up his suggestions.


Case Authors : Hubert Pun, Josh Weinstein

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Improving a Hockey Team Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005657) -10005657 - -
Year 1 3466094 -6539563 3466094 0.9434 3269900
Year 2 3955692 -2583871 7421786 0.89 3520552
Year 3 3960931 1377060 11382717 0.8396 3325674
Year 4 3234001 4611061 14616718 0.7921 2561632
TOTAL 14616718 12677758




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2672101

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Fan Favourite have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Fan Favourite shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Improving a Hockey Team

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Fan Favourite often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Fan Favourite needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005657) -10005657 - -
Year 1 3466094 -6539563 3466094 0.8696 3013995
Year 2 3955692 -2583871 7421786 0.7561 2991071
Year 3 3960931 1377060 11382717 0.6575 2604376
Year 4 3234001 4611061 14616718 0.5718 1849051
TOTAL 10458493


The Net NPV after 4 years is 452836

(10458493 - 10005657 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005657) -10005657 - -
Year 1 3466094 -6539563 3466094 0.8333 2888412
Year 2 3955692 -2583871 7421786 0.6944 2747008
Year 3 3960931 1377060 11382717 0.5787 2292205
Year 4 3234001 4611061 14616718 0.4823 1559607
TOTAL 9487232


The Net NPV after 4 years is -518425

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487232 - 10005657 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Fan Favourite to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Fan Favourite has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Fan Favourite can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Fan Favourite, then the stock price of the Fan Favourite should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Fan Favourite should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Improving a Hockey Team

References & Further Readings

Hubert Pun, Josh Weinstein (2018), "Improving a Hockey Team Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


RCS MediaGroup SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


Pledge Petroleum SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Dana Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Han Il E-Wha SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


American Axle&Manufacturing SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


BIEM.L .FDLKK Garment SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Toami SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


China Gas Hold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


GR Engineering Services Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Novan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs