A Cascade of Emergencies (A): Responding to Superstorm Sandy in New York City Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for A Cascade of Emergencies (A): Responding to Superstorm Sandy in New York City case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. A Cascade of Emergencies (A): Responding to Superstorm Sandy in New York City case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Arnold M. Howitt, David Giles. The A Cascade of Emergencies (A): Responding to Superstorm Sandy in New York City (referred as “City Superstorm” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Risk management, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of A Cascade of Emergencies (A): Responding to Superstorm Sandy in New York City Case Study

On October 29, 2012, Superstorm Sandy made landfall near Atlantic City, New Jersey. Sandy's massive size, coupled with an unusual combination of meteorological conditions, fueled an especially powerful and destructive storm surge, which caused unprecedented damage in and around New York City, the country's most populous metropolitan area, as well as on Long Island and along the Jersey Shore. This two-part case study focuses on how New York City prepared for the storm's arrival and then responded to the cascading series of emergencies - from fires, to flooding, to power failures - that played out as it bore down on the city. Profiling actions taken at the local level by emergency response agencies like the New York City Fire Department (FDNY), the case also explores how the city coordinated with state and federal partners - including both the state National Guard and federal military components - and illustrates both the advantages and complications of using military assets for domestic emergency response operations. Case number 2124.0

Case Authors : Arnold M. Howitt, David Giles

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Risk management, Sustainability

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for A Cascade of Emergencies (A): Responding to Superstorm Sandy in New York City Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012909)	-10012909	-	-
Year 1	3470535	-6542374	3470535	0.9434	3274090
Year 2	3982127	-2560247	7452662	0.89	3544079
Year 3	3949119	1388872	11401781	0.8396	3315756
Year 4	3237993	4626865	14639774	0.7921	2564794
TOTAL			14639774		12698719

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2685810

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. City Superstorm shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of City Superstorm have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of A Cascade of Emergencies (A): Responding to Superstorm Sandy in New York City

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at City Superstorm often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at City Superstorm needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012909)	-10012909	-	-
Year 1	3470535	-6542374	3470535	0.8696	3017857
Year 2	3982127	-2560247	7452662	0.7561	3011060
Year 3	3949119	1388872	11401781	0.6575	2596610
Year 4	3237993	4626865	14639774	0.5718	1851333
TOTAL					10476859

The Net NPV after 4 years is 463950

(10476859 - 10012909 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012909)	-10012909	-	-
Year 1	3470535	-6542374	3470535	0.8333	2892113
Year 2	3982127	-2560247	7452662	0.6944	2765366
Year 3	3949119	1388872	11401781	0.5787	2285370
Year 4	3237993	4626865	14639774	0.4823	1561532
TOTAL					9504380

The Net NPV after 4 years is -508529

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9504380 - 10012909 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of City Superstorm to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of City Superstorm has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at City Superstorm can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at City Superstorm, then the stock price of the City Superstorm should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at City Superstorm should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of A Cascade of Emergencies (A): Responding to Superstorm Sandy in New York City

References & Further Readings

Arnold M. Howitt, David Giles (2018), "A Cascade of Emergencies (A): Responding to Superstorm Sandy in New York City Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.