×




Las Vegas Sands Corp.: Pricing Game in Vegas Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Las Vegas Sands Corp.: Pricing Game in Vegas case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Las Vegas Sands Corp.: Pricing Game in Vegas case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Seok-Woo Kwon, Won-Yong Oh, Brooke Miskiman. The Las Vegas Sands Corp.: Pricing Game in Vegas (referred as “Vegas Las” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Pricing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Las Vegas Sands Corp.: Pricing Game in Vegas Case Study


In 2016, MGM Resorts International announced it would break with the long-standing tradition of providing free parking on the Las Vegas Strip. Other Las Vegas resort companies, including Caesars Entertainment and Wynn Resorts, soon followed suit. Las Vegas Sands Corp. owned the Venetian Resort Hotel Casino, the Palazzo, and the Sands Expo and Convention Center, and had no plans to charge for parking. As more hotels and casinos chose to implement paid parking on the Las Vegas Strip, the president and chief operating officer of Las Vegas Sands Corp. properties faced a decision: should the Las Vegas Sands Corp. properties continue to offer free self-parking and use it as a differentiating marketing tactic, or should it follow the trend of its competitors and generate additional income by introducing parking fee? Seok Woo Kwon is affiliated with University of Calgary.


Case Authors : Seok-Woo Kwon, Won-Yong Oh, Brooke Miskiman

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Pricing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Las Vegas Sands Corp.: Pricing Game in Vegas Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016485) -10016485 - -
Year 1 3449645 -6566840 3449645 0.9434 3254382
Year 2 3961606 -2605234 7411251 0.89 3525815
Year 3 3951695 1346461 11362946 0.8396 3317919
Year 4 3251337 4597798 14614283 0.7921 2575363
TOTAL 14614283 12673480




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2656995

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Vegas Las shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Vegas Las have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Las Vegas Sands Corp.: Pricing Game in Vegas

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Vegas Las often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Vegas Las needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016485) -10016485 - -
Year 1 3449645 -6566840 3449645 0.8696 2999691
Year 2 3961606 -2605234 7411251 0.7561 2995543
Year 3 3951695 1346461 11362946 0.6575 2598304
Year 4 3251337 4597798 14614283 0.5718 1858962
TOTAL 10452501


The Net NPV after 4 years is 436016

(10452501 - 10016485 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016485) -10016485 - -
Year 1 3449645 -6566840 3449645 0.8333 2874704
Year 2 3961606 -2605234 7411251 0.6944 2751115
Year 3 3951695 1346461 11362946 0.5787 2286861
Year 4 3251337 4597798 14614283 0.4823 1567967
TOTAL 9480647


The Net NPV after 4 years is -535838

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9480647 - 10016485 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Vegas Las to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Vegas Las has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Vegas Las can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Vegas Las, then the stock price of the Vegas Las should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Vegas Las should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Las Vegas Sands Corp.: Pricing Game in Vegas

References & Further Readings

Seok-Woo Kwon, Won-Yong Oh, Brooke Miskiman (2018), "Las Vegas Sands Corp.: Pricing Game in Vegas Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Keisei Electric Railway SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Tungsten A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Rocket Mobile SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Newzulu SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Suedzucker SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Gold River Prods Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures