Ak Gida: IPO or Strategic Sale Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Ak Gida: IPO or Strategic Sale case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Ak Gida: IPO or Strategic Sale case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Suraj Srinivasan, Eren Kuzucu. The Ak Gida: IPO or Strategic Sale (referred as “Gida Ak” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Crisis management, Decision making, Financial analysis, Growth strategy, IPO, Joint ventures, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of Ak Gida: IPO or Strategic Sale Case Study

In 2015, Yildiz Holding, one of the world's largest producer of confections, biscuits and crackers, was at the end of its divesture process from Ak Gida, one of the leading dairy companies in Turkey. The company had adopted a dual track process, pursuing an initial public offering (IPO) process as well as attempting, in parallel, a strategic sale to create a competitive bidding process. Ak Gida was co-founded in 1996 by the Ulker and Topbas families as a result of a joint vertical integration strategy: Ulker family, owners of Yildiz Holding, would secure milk powder, one of the main raw materials for its biscuits and chocolate production, and Topbas family would be able to create its own private label dairy products for its nation-wide hard-discount chain BIM. Following Yildiz Holding's acquisition of United Biscuits for over $3 billion in 2014, the Holding's CFO Cem Karakas and its Chief Strategy and Growth Officer Nurtac Ziyal Afridi, were tasked with divesting of its vertical assets including Ak Gida. The duo had prepared Ak Gida for an IPO in Istanbul, while also having negotiated with multiple parties for its sale. Now, the duo needed to make a final decision: should they go forward with the listing, or should they sell Ak Gida to the world's largest dairy company, Groupe Lactalis?

Case Authors : Suraj Srinivasan, Eren Kuzucu

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Crisis management, Decision making, Financial analysis, Growth strategy, IPO, Joint ventures, Mergers & acquisitions

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Ak Gida: IPO or Strategic Sale Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011463) -10011463 - -
Year 1 3449749 -6561714 3449749 0.9434 3254480
Year 2 3962929 -2598785 7412678 0.89 3526993
Year 3 3975352 1376567 11388030 0.8396 3337782
Year 4 3224450 4601017 14612480 0.7921 2554066
TOTAL 14612480 12673321

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2661858

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Gida Ak shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Gida Ak have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Ak Gida: IPO or Strategic Sale

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Gida Ak often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Gida Ak needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011463) -10011463 - -
Year 1 3449749 -6561714 3449749 0.8696 2999782
Year 2 3962929 -2598785 7412678 0.7561 2996544
Year 3 3975352 1376567 11388030 0.6575 2613858
Year 4 3224450 4601017 14612480 0.5718 1843590
TOTAL 10453774

The Net NPV after 4 years is 442311

(10453774 - 10011463 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011463) -10011463 - -
Year 1 3449749 -6561714 3449749 0.8333 2874791
Year 2 3962929 -2598785 7412678 0.6944 2752034
Year 3 3975352 1376567 11388030 0.5787 2300551
Year 4 3224450 4601017 14612480 0.4823 1555001
TOTAL 9482377

The Net NPV after 4 years is -529086

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9482377 - 10011463 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Gida Ak to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Gida Ak has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Gida Ak can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Gida Ak, then the stock price of the Gida Ak should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Gida Ak should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

Negotiation Strategy of Ak Gida: IPO or Strategic Sale

References & Further Readings

Suraj Srinivasan, Eren Kuzucu (2018), "Ak Gida: IPO or Strategic Sale Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.

Mitsubishi Motors Corp. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers

TEE International Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services

Responsive Industries Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures

Essel Propack SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging

ERG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities