×




Performance Management Systems: How Companies are Rethinking People Development Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Performance Management Systems: How Companies are Rethinking People Development case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Performance Management Systems: How Companies are Rethinking People Development case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by June A. West, John P. Kelly. The Performance Management Systems: How Companies are Rethinking People Development (referred as “Coaching Performance” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Human resource management, Organizational culture, Performance measurement.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Performance Management Systems: How Companies are Rethinking People Development Case Study


Business has become increasingly globalized, interconnected, and disrupted by the unceasing progress of technology. As markets span ever-larger geographical areas, the war for talent among companies continues to heat up. As businesspeople enter the workforce, they seek not only challenging and stimulating roles with competitive compensation, but also organizations dedicated to people development. To attract the best and the brightest, companies are finding that they must demonstrate a commitment to training, coaching, and career planning. At the heart of people development is performance management, and this note does a deep dive on how performance management systems are wound into the fabric of our companies, how to leverage effective tools for evaluating and coaching employees, and how to look to examples of best-in-class organizations for creating a strong performance feedback culture.


Case Authors : June A. West, John P. Kelly

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Human resource management, Organizational culture, Performance measurement




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Performance Management Systems: How Companies are Rethinking People Development Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029673) -10029673 - -
Year 1 3472790 -6556883 3472790 0.9434 3276217
Year 2 3964332 -2592551 7437122 0.89 3528241
Year 3 3943396 1350845 11380518 0.8396 3310951
Year 4 3231671 4582516 14612189 0.7921 2559786
TOTAL 14612189 12675196




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2645523

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Coaching Performance have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Coaching Performance shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Performance Management Systems: How Companies are Rethinking People Development

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Coaching Performance often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Coaching Performance needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029673) -10029673 - -
Year 1 3472790 -6556883 3472790 0.8696 3019817
Year 2 3964332 -2592551 7437122 0.7561 2997605
Year 3 3943396 1350845 11380518 0.6575 2592847
Year 4 3231671 4582516 14612189 0.5718 1847718
TOTAL 10457987


The Net NPV after 4 years is 428314

(10457987 - 10029673 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029673) -10029673 - -
Year 1 3472790 -6556883 3472790 0.8333 2893992
Year 2 3964332 -2592551 7437122 0.6944 2753008
Year 3 3943396 1350845 11380518 0.5787 2282058
Year 4 3231671 4582516 14612189 0.4823 1558483
TOTAL 9487541


The Net NPV after 4 years is -542132

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487541 - 10029673 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Coaching Performance to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Coaching Performance has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Coaching Performance can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Coaching Performance, then the stock price of the Coaching Performance should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Coaching Performance should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Performance Management Systems: How Companies are Rethinking People Development

References & Further Readings

June A. West, John P. Kelly (2018), "Performance Management Systems: How Companies are Rethinking People Development Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Harta Aman Pratama SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Alumasc Group PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Argonaut Gold Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Sichuan Languang Dev SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


China Design SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


International Leaders SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Plasto-Cargal SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Yamashin-Filter SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Shanghai Sinyang Semiconductor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing