×




Guilty By Association: The Risk of Crisis Contagion Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Guilty By Association: The Risk of Crisis Contagion case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Guilty By Association: The Risk of Crisis Contagion case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Daniel Laufer, Yijing Wang. The Guilty By Association: The Risk of Crisis Contagion (referred as “Contagion Crisis” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership, Personnel policies, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Guilty By Association: The Risk of Crisis Contagion Case Study


Crisis contagion, or how a crisis spreads from one company to another, has received very little attention from researchers. This is surprising as the negative consequences of crisis contagion can be significant when customers make assumptions of guilt by association. This article focuses on this important issue and describes four risk factors-country of origin, industry, organizational type, and positioning strategy-that increase the likelihood of crisis contagion. Valuable guidance is also provided on whether a company should issue a denial or remain silent if it faces the risk of crisis contagion.


Case Authors : Daniel Laufer, Yijing Wang

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Leadership, Personnel policies, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Guilty By Association: The Risk of Crisis Contagion Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026549) -10026549 - -
Year 1 3461938 -6564611 3461938 0.9434 3265979
Year 2 3958265 -2606346 7420203 0.89 3522842
Year 3 3958811 1352465 11379014 0.8396 3323894
Year 4 3227328 4579793 14606342 0.7921 2556346
TOTAL 14606342 12669061




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2642512

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Contagion Crisis have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Contagion Crisis shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Guilty By Association: The Risk of Crisis Contagion

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Contagion Crisis often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Contagion Crisis needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026549) -10026549 - -
Year 1 3461938 -6564611 3461938 0.8696 3010381
Year 2 3958265 -2606346 7420203 0.7561 2993017
Year 3 3958811 1352465 11379014 0.6575 2602982
Year 4 3227328 4579793 14606342 0.5718 1845235
TOTAL 10451616


The Net NPV after 4 years is 425067

(10451616 - 10026549 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026549) -10026549 - -
Year 1 3461938 -6564611 3461938 0.8333 2884948
Year 2 3958265 -2606346 7420203 0.6944 2748795
Year 3 3958811 1352465 11379014 0.5787 2290979
Year 4 3227328 4579793 14606342 0.4823 1556389
TOTAL 9481111


The Net NPV after 4 years is -545438

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9481111 - 10026549 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Contagion Crisis to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Contagion Crisis has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Contagion Crisis can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Contagion Crisis, then the stock price of the Contagion Crisis should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Contagion Crisis should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Guilty By Association: The Risk of Crisis Contagion

References & Further Readings

Daniel Laufer, Yijing Wang (2018), "Guilty By Association: The Risk of Crisis Contagion Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Bank Mitraniaga SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , S&Ls/Savings Banks


Cineworld SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Motion Pictures


Vango Mining Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Eurazeo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Telford Homes SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Roxgold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Curexo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Simigon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Scorpio Bulkers SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Simon Property SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations