×




Exercise for Market Creation in a Highly Competitive Industry Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Exercise for Market Creation in a Highly Competitive Industry case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Exercise for Market Creation in a Highly Competitive Industry case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by W. Chan Kim, Renee Mauborgne, Oh Young Koo. The Exercise for Market Creation in a Highly Competitive Industry (referred as “Ocean Blue” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Economy, Entrepreneurship, Innovation.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Exercise for Market Creation in a Highly Competitive Industry Case Study


The case is a combination of strategy formulation exercise and case method. It consists of three parts: 1) Part A looks into the competitive landscape of the travel industry in Korea and ends with the challenging question to participants to create their own blue ocean strategy as a group work. 2) Blue Ocean Shift Exercise is conducted in the classroom using the worksheets. It provides detailed information in a pre-set format. Participants follow the process of blue ocean shift using the Buyer Utility Map, the Noncustomer Analysis, the Six-Path Framework, the E-R-R-C Grid, and the To-Be Strategy Canvas to create their own blue ocean strategy. 3) Part B provides an example of creating a new market space in the travel industry in 2012 in Korea-My Real Trip. This theory-based video case narrates how My Real Trip reconstructed the market boundaries and created new demand in the crowded and divided travel industry. The strategic move can be discussed in the classroom accompanied by lecture slides.


Case Authors : W. Chan Kim, Renee Mauborgne, Oh Young Koo

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Economy, Entrepreneurship, Innovation




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Exercise for Market Creation in a Highly Competitive Industry Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012299) -10012299 - -
Year 1 3452071 -6560228 3452071 0.9434 3256671
Year 2 3964170 -2596058 7416241 0.89 3528097
Year 3 3957567 1361509 11373808 0.8396 3322850
Year 4 3229853 4591362 14603661 0.7921 2558346
TOTAL 14603661 12665964




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2653665

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Ocean Blue shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Ocean Blue have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Exercise for Market Creation in a Highly Competitive Industry

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Ocean Blue often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Ocean Blue needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012299) -10012299 - -
Year 1 3452071 -6560228 3452071 0.8696 3001801
Year 2 3964170 -2596058 7416241 0.7561 2997482
Year 3 3957567 1361509 11373808 0.6575 2602165
Year 4 3229853 4591362 14603661 0.5718 1846679
TOTAL 10448126


The Net NPV after 4 years is 435827

(10448126 - 10012299 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012299) -10012299 - -
Year 1 3452071 -6560228 3452071 0.8333 2876726
Year 2 3964170 -2596058 7416241 0.6944 2752896
Year 3 3957567 1361509 11373808 0.5787 2290259
Year 4 3229853 4591362 14603661 0.4823 1557607
TOTAL 9477487


The Net NPV after 4 years is -534812

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9477487 - 10012299 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Ocean Blue to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Ocean Blue has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Ocean Blue can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Ocean Blue, then the stock price of the Ocean Blue should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Ocean Blue should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Exercise for Market Creation in a Highly Competitive Industry

References & Further Readings

W. Chan Kim, Renee Mauborgne, Oh Young Koo (2018), "Exercise for Market Creation in a Highly Competitive Industry Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Cheetah SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Merlin Properties SA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Unilever Indonesia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Wanbury Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Amur Minerals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Wonik Cube SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Gefran SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


OKH Global Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Networks


West Japan Railway Co. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation