×




New Wachovia (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for New Wachovia (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. New Wachovia (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Carliss Y. Baldwin, Jeremy Swinson. The New Wachovia (A) (referred as “Wachovia Consummate” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of New Wachovia (A) Case Study


In April 2001, First Union Corp. announced an agreement to merge with Wachovia Corp., a fellow North Carolina-based commercial bank. While the banks were preparing to consummate the merger, SunTrust Banks, Inc. of Atlanta, made a hostile offer for Wachovia, setting in motion an intense proxy fight with a forum encompassing the media, the courts, the investor community, and Wall Street. In July 2002, Kenneth Thompson, CEO of First Union, was considering First Union's next move knowing that Wachovia shareholders would convene on August 3 to decide the fate of the proposed transaction.


Case Authors : Carliss Y. Baldwin, Jeremy Swinson

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Mergers & acquisitions




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for New Wachovia (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000472) -10000472 - -
Year 1 3448127 -6552345 3448127 0.9434 3252950
Year 2 3962791 -2589554 7410918 0.89 3526870
Year 3 3937176 1347622 11348094 0.8396 3305729
Year 4 3240128 4587750 14588222 0.7921 2566485
TOTAL 14588222 12652034




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2651562

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Wachovia Consummate shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Wachovia Consummate have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of New Wachovia (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Wachovia Consummate often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Wachovia Consummate needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000472) -10000472 - -
Year 1 3448127 -6552345 3448127 0.8696 2998371
Year 2 3962791 -2589554 7410918 0.7561 2996439
Year 3 3937176 1347622 11348094 0.6575 2588757
Year 4 3240128 4587750 14588222 0.5718 1852554
TOTAL 10436121


The Net NPV after 4 years is 435649

(10436121 - 10000472 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000472) -10000472 - -
Year 1 3448127 -6552345 3448127 0.8333 2873439
Year 2 3962791 -2589554 7410918 0.6944 2751938
Year 3 3937176 1347622 11348094 0.5787 2278458
Year 4 3240128 4587750 14588222 0.4823 1562562
TOTAL 9466397


The Net NPV after 4 years is -534075

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9466397 - 10000472 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Wachovia Consummate to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Wachovia Consummate has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Wachovia Consummate can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Wachovia Consummate, then the stock price of the Wachovia Consummate should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Wachovia Consummate should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of New Wachovia (A)

References & Further Readings

Carliss Y. Baldwin, Jeremy Swinson (2018), "New Wachovia (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Soko Seiren SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Jikai Equipment SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Scynexis Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Hansol Chemica SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


CVS Health Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Enegex NL SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Ambuja Cements SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials