×




Lion Capital and the Blackstone Group: The Orangina Deal Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Lion Capital and the Blackstone Group: The Orangina Deal case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Lion Capital and the Blackstone Group: The Orangina Deal case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by G. Felda Hardymon, Josh Lerner, Ann Leamon. The Lion Capital and the Blackstone Group: The Orangina Deal (referred as “Orangina Forestall” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, Joint ventures, Mergers & acquisitions, Negotiations.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Lion Capital and the Blackstone Group: The Orangina Deal Case Study


The managing partners of two private equity firms are hoping to forestall a third bidding round for a target company, the European beverage division of Cadbury Schweppes. As they wait to meet with the CEO, they revisit their assumptions on the deal and review the insights that informed their valuation.


Case Authors : G. Felda Hardymon, Josh Lerner, Ann Leamon

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management, Joint ventures, Mergers & acquisitions, Negotiations




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Lion Capital and the Blackstone Group: The Orangina Deal Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010587) -10010587 - -
Year 1 3465323 -6545264 3465323 0.9434 3269173
Year 2 3974099 -2571165 7439422 0.89 3536934
Year 3 3972398 1401233 11411820 0.8396 3335302
Year 4 3234853 4636086 14646673 0.7921 2562307
TOTAL 14646673 12703715




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2693128

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Orangina Forestall have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Orangina Forestall shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Lion Capital and the Blackstone Group: The Orangina Deal

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Orangina Forestall often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Orangina Forestall needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010587) -10010587 - -
Year 1 3465323 -6545264 3465323 0.8696 3013324
Year 2 3974099 -2571165 7439422 0.7561 3004990
Year 3 3972398 1401233 11411820 0.6575 2611916
Year 4 3234853 4636086 14646673 0.5718 1849538
TOTAL 10479768


The Net NPV after 4 years is 469181

(10479768 - 10010587 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010587) -10010587 - -
Year 1 3465323 -6545264 3465323 0.8333 2887769
Year 2 3974099 -2571165 7439422 0.6944 2759791
Year 3 3972398 1401233 11411820 0.5787 2298841
Year 4 3234853 4636086 14646673 0.4823 1560018
TOTAL 9506419


The Net NPV after 4 years is -504168

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9506419 - 10010587 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Orangina Forestall to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Orangina Forestall has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Orangina Forestall can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Orangina Forestall, then the stock price of the Orangina Forestall should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Orangina Forestall should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Lion Capital and the Blackstone Group: The Orangina Deal

References & Further Readings

G. Felda Hardymon, Josh Lerner, Ann Leamon (2018), "Lion Capital and the Blackstone Group: The Orangina Deal Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Instructure Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Doosan Bobcat Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Cardinal Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


ITCen SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Realworld SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Intellian Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Biken Techno SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services