×




Multifactor Models Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Multifactor Models case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Multifactor Models case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Malcolm P. Baker. The Multifactor Models (referred as “Multifactor Capm” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Behavioral economics, Business models, Costs, Financial markets, Motivating people.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Multifactor Models Case Study


Students evaluate the performance of four mutual funds and compute the cost of capital for two companies using fixed benchmarks, the CAPM, and a multifactor model of returns.


Case Authors : Malcolm P. Baker

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Behavioral economics, Business models, Costs, Financial markets, Motivating people




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Multifactor Models Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024850) -10024850 - -
Year 1 3450997 -6573853 3450997 0.9434 3255658
Year 2 3979445 -2594408 7430442 0.89 3541692
Year 3 3947433 1353025 11377875 0.8396 3314341
Year 4 3239077 4592102 14616952 0.7921 2565652
TOTAL 14616952 12677343




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2652493

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Multifactor Capm have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Multifactor Capm shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Multifactor Models

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Multifactor Capm often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Multifactor Capm needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024850) -10024850 - -
Year 1 3450997 -6573853 3450997 0.8696 3000867
Year 2 3979445 -2594408 7430442 0.7561 3009032
Year 3 3947433 1353025 11377875 0.6575 2595501
Year 4 3239077 4592102 14616952 0.5718 1851953
TOTAL 10457353


The Net NPV after 4 years is 432503

(10457353 - 10024850 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024850) -10024850 - -
Year 1 3450997 -6573853 3450997 0.8333 2875831
Year 2 3979445 -2594408 7430442 0.6944 2763503
Year 3 3947433 1353025 11377875 0.5787 2284394
Year 4 3239077 4592102 14616952 0.4823 1562055
TOTAL 9485783


The Net NPV after 4 years is -539067

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9485783 - 10024850 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Multifactor Capm to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Multifactor Capm has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Multifactor Capm can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Multifactor Capm, then the stock price of the Multifactor Capm should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Multifactor Capm should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Multifactor Models

References & Further Readings

Malcolm P. Baker (2018), "Multifactor Models Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Finedigital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Cronos SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Prysmian SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Altria SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Tobacco


RadiSys SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Hardware


MakeMyTrip SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Global Brokerage SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Fyber SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


International Seaways SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Korea New Network SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Broadcasting & Cable TV


Hanwha Life SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Life)