×




Henkel: Building a Winning Culture Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Henkel: Building a Winning Culture case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Henkel: Building a Winning Culture case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert L. Simons, Natalie Kindred. The Henkel: Building a Winning Culture (referred as “Henkel Rorsted” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Change management, Collaboration, Executive compensation, Financial analysis, Organizational culture, Performance measurement, Personnel policies, Social responsibility, Strategy execution, Work-life balance.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Henkel: Building a Winning Culture Case Study


This case illustrates a CEO-led organizational transformation driven by stretch goals, performance measurement, and accountability. When Kasper Rorsted became CEO of Henkel, a Germany-based producer of personal care, laundry, and adhesives products, in 2008, he was determined to transform a corporate culture of "good enough" into one singularly focused on winning in a competitive marketplace. Historically, Henkel was a comfortable, stable place to work. Many employees never received negative performance feedback. Seeking to overturn a pervasive attitude of complacency, Rorsted implemented a multi-step change initiative aimed at building a "winning culture." First, in November 2008, he announced a set of ambitious financial targets for 2012. As financial turmoil roiled the global economy, he reaffirmed his commitment to these targets, sending a clear signal to Henkel employees and external stakeholders that excuses were no longer acceptable. Rorsted next introduced a new set of five company values-replacing the previous list of 10 values, which few employees could recite by memory-the first of which emphasized a focus on customers. He also instituted a new, simplified performance management system, which rated managers' performance and advancement potential on a four-point scale. The system also included a forced ranking requirement, mandating that a defined percentage of employees (in each business unit and company-wide) be ranked as top, strong, moderate, or low performers. These ratings significantly impacted managers' bonus compensation. In late 2011-the time in which the case takes place-Henkel is well on its way to achieving its 2012 targets. Having shed nearly half its top management team, along with numerous product sites and brands, Henkel appears to be a leaner, more competitive, "winning" organization.


Case Authors : Robert L. Simons, Natalie Kindred

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Change management, Collaboration, Executive compensation, Financial analysis, Organizational culture, Performance measurement, Personnel policies, Social responsibility, Strategy execution, Work-life balance




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Henkel: Building a Winning Culture Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007024) -10007024 - -
Year 1 3465989 -6541035 3465989 0.9434 3269801
Year 2 3959705 -2581330 7425694 0.89 3524123
Year 3 3957455 1376125 11383149 0.8396 3322756
Year 4 3230597 4606722 14613746 0.7921 2558935
TOTAL 14613746 12675615




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2668591

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Henkel Rorsted shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Henkel Rorsted have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Henkel: Building a Winning Culture

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Henkel Rorsted often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Henkel Rorsted needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007024) -10007024 - -
Year 1 3465989 -6541035 3465989 0.8696 3013903
Year 2 3959705 -2581330 7425694 0.7561 2994106
Year 3 3957455 1376125 11383149 0.6575 2602091
Year 4 3230597 4606722 14613746 0.5718 1847104
TOTAL 10457205


The Net NPV after 4 years is 450181

(10457205 - 10007024 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007024) -10007024 - -
Year 1 3465989 -6541035 3465989 0.8333 2888324
Year 2 3959705 -2581330 7425694 0.6944 2749795
Year 3 3957455 1376125 11383149 0.5787 2290194
Year 4 3230597 4606722 14613746 0.4823 1557965
TOTAL 9486279


The Net NPV after 4 years is -520745

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9486279 - 10007024 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Henkel Rorsted to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Henkel Rorsted has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Henkel Rorsted can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Henkel Rorsted, then the stock price of the Henkel Rorsted should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Henkel Rorsted should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Henkel: Building a Winning Culture

References & Further Readings

Robert L. Simons, Natalie Kindred (2018), "Henkel: Building a Winning Culture Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


JSB Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Shangfeng Cement A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


SomnoMed Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


House Foods Group Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Sanlux Rubber A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Maxwell Resource SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Chinese Town A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Khaitan Electricals Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Tadmax Resources Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Forestry & Wood Products