ALPES S.A.: A Joint Venture Proposal (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for ALPES S.A.: A Joint Venture Proposal (A) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. ALPES S.A.: A Joint Venture Proposal (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Henry W. Lane, Dennis Shaughnessy, David T.A. Wesley. The ALPES S.A.: A Joint Venture Proposal (A) (referred as “Joint Laboratories” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, Joint ventures, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of ALPES S.A.: A Joint Venture Proposal (A) Case Study

The senior vice-president for corporate development for Charles River Laboratories must prepare a presentation to the company's board of directors requesting up to a $2 million investment in a Mexican joint venture with a family-owned animal health company. However, the CEO views the proposed joint venture as a potential distraction while his company continues to expand rapidly in the United States. He is also worried about the risks of investing in a country like Mexico and the plan to partner with a small, family-owned company. Moreover, the Mexican partner is unable to invest any cash in the joint venture, which would need to be fully funded by Charles River Laboratories.

Case Authors : Henry W. Lane, Dennis Shaughnessy, David T.A. Wesley

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management, Joint ventures, Risk management

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for ALPES S.A.: A Joint Venture Proposal (A) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10002979)	-10002979	-	-
Year 1	3450501	-6552478	3450501	0.9434	3255190
Year 2	3973826	-2578652	7424327	0.89	3536691
Year 3	3936996	1358344	11361323	0.8396	3305578
Year 4	3243487	4601831	14604810	0.7921	2569145
TOTAL			14604810		12666604

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2663625

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Joint Laboratories have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Joint Laboratories shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of ALPES S.A.: A Joint Venture Proposal (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Joint Laboratories often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Joint Laboratories needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10002979)	-10002979	-	-
Year 1	3450501	-6552478	3450501	0.8696	3000436
Year 2	3973826	-2578652	7424327	0.7561	3004783
Year 3	3936996	1358344	11361323	0.6575	2588639
Year 4	3243487	4601831	14604810	0.5718	1854474
TOTAL					10448332

The Net NPV after 4 years is 445353

(10448332 - 10002979 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10002979)	-10002979	-	-
Year 1	3450501	-6552478	3450501	0.8333	2875418
Year 2	3973826	-2578652	7424327	0.6944	2759601
Year 3	3936996	1358344	11361323	0.5787	2278354
Year 4	3243487	4601831	14604810	0.4823	1564182
TOTAL					9477555

The Net NPV after 4 years is -525424

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9477555 - 10002979 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Joint Laboratories to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Joint Laboratories has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Joint Laboratories can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Joint Laboratories, then the stock price of the Joint Laboratories should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Joint Laboratories should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of ALPES S.A.: A Joint Venture Proposal (A)

References & Further Readings

Henry W. Lane, Dennis Shaughnessy, David T.A. Wesley (2018), "ALPES S.A.: A Joint Venture Proposal (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.