×




Bottlenecks in Land Supply: Government or Developers to Blame? Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Bottlenecks in Land Supply: Government or Developers to Blame? case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Bottlenecks in Land Supply: Government or Developers to Blame? case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ka-Fu Wong, Carola Ramon-Berjano. The Bottlenecks in Land Supply: Government or Developers to Blame? (referred as “Land Supply” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Policy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Bottlenecks in Land Supply: Government or Developers to Blame? Case Study


The Hong Kong government's land policy seems to aggravate the shortage of land supply there. All land is owned by the government and is released at stipulated times when supply is considered to be short. But the government's policy is not the only factor influencing the supply of land in Hong Kong. When developers buy land from the government, they are not required to build immediately; instead, they often buy new land to augment their land banks. A handful of large developers, therefore, have the power to influence land supply and, thus, prices. The result is a shortage of properties, high prices, and an average unit size that is smaller than that of other countries.


Case Authors : Ka-Fu Wong, Carola Ramon-Berjano

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Policy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Bottlenecks in Land Supply: Government or Developers to Blame? Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001461) -10001461 - -
Year 1 3462765 -6538696 3462765 0.9434 3266759
Year 2 3964856 -2573840 7427621 0.89 3528708
Year 3 3970096 1396256 11397717 0.8396 3333369
Year 4 3249267 4645523 14646984 0.7921 2573724
TOTAL 14646984 12702560




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2701099

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Land Supply shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Land Supply have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Bottlenecks in Land Supply: Government or Developers to Blame?

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Land Supply often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Land Supply needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001461) -10001461 - -
Year 1 3462765 -6538696 3462765 0.8696 3011100
Year 2 3964856 -2573840 7427621 0.7561 2998001
Year 3 3970096 1396256 11397717 0.6575 2610403
Year 4 3249267 4645523 14646984 0.5718 1857779
TOTAL 10477282


The Net NPV after 4 years is 475821

(10477282 - 10001461 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001461) -10001461 - -
Year 1 3462765 -6538696 3462765 0.8333 2885638
Year 2 3964856 -2573840 7427621 0.6944 2753372
Year 3 3970096 1396256 11397717 0.5787 2297509
Year 4 3249267 4645523 14646984 0.4823 1566969
TOTAL 9503488


The Net NPV after 4 years is -497973

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9503488 - 10001461 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Land Supply to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Land Supply has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Land Supply can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Land Supply, then the stock price of the Land Supply should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Land Supply should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Bottlenecks in Land Supply: Government or Developers to Blame?

References & Further Readings

Ka-Fu Wong, Carola Ramon-Berjano (2018), "Bottlenecks in Land Supply: Government or Developers to Blame? Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Alexander Mining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Tifa Finance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Rental & Leasing


Lumimicro SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Kwan On SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Kodensha SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services