×




Network Associates: Securing the Internet Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Network Associates: Securing the Internet case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Network Associates: Securing the Internet case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jennifer Burns, Debora L. Spar. The Network Associates: Securing the Internet (referred as “Encryption Associates” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Government, Internet, Security & privacy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Network Associates: Securing the Internet Case Study


Follows one company's path through the uncharted terrain of government regulation and the Internet. In March 1998, Network Associates announced it would begin selling powerful encryption software from its Dutch subsidiary. Such a move looked to the U.S. government like a violation of export regulations, but the company was confident it had operated within the bounds of law. Indeed, Network Associates appeared to have deftly exploited the uncertain nature of government regulation in a time of rapidly changing technology. Encryption export regulations had become highly controversial in the mid-1990s, and were the subject of ongoing legislative debate in 1998. While the regulations had been slowly evolving toward permissiveness, the pace of change did not meet the expectations of many companies in Silicon Valley. Network Associates was the first company to boldly challenge the export regulations and assert its commercial rights to sell its encryption products to foreign users. While such a move gave the company distinct first-mover advantages, it was also a strategy that contained significant political risks.


Case Authors : Jennifer Burns, Debora L. Spar

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Government, Internet, Security & privacy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Network Associates: Securing the Internet Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015639) -10015639 - -
Year 1 3445687 -6569952 3445687 0.9434 3250648
Year 2 3964089 -2605863 7409776 0.89 3528025
Year 3 3937743 1331880 11347519 0.8396 3306205
Year 4 3229867 4561747 14577386 0.7921 2558357
TOTAL 14577386 12643235




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2627596

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Encryption Associates have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Encryption Associates shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Network Associates: Securing the Internet

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Encryption Associates often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Encryption Associates needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015639) -10015639 - -
Year 1 3445687 -6569952 3445687 0.8696 2996250
Year 2 3964089 -2605863 7409776 0.7561 2997421
Year 3 3937743 1331880 11347519 0.6575 2589130
Year 4 3229867 4561747 14577386 0.5718 1846687
TOTAL 10429487


The Net NPV after 4 years is 413848

(10429487 - 10015639 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015639) -10015639 - -
Year 1 3445687 -6569952 3445687 0.8333 2871406
Year 2 3964089 -2605863 7409776 0.6944 2752840
Year 3 3937743 1331880 11347519 0.5787 2278786
Year 4 3229867 4561747 14577386 0.4823 1557613
TOTAL 9460645


The Net NPV after 4 years is -554994

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9460645 - 10015639 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Encryption Associates to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Encryption Associates has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Encryption Associates can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Encryption Associates, then the stock price of the Encryption Associates should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Encryption Associates should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Network Associates: Securing the Internet

References & Further Readings

Jennifer Burns, Debora L. Spar (2018), "Network Associates: Securing the Internet Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Adler Real Estate SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Carr’s Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Woodlandor Holdings Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


AsiaPhos Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Non-Metallic Mining


Merck SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Major Drugs


Jiangsu Phoenix Property SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


State Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Forbidden Technologies SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming