×




Note on Cable Television Regulation Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Note on Cable Television Regulation case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Note on Cable Television Regulation case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Willis Emmons, David Gossman. The Note on Cable Television Regulation (referred as “Cable Television” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Economy, Growth strategy, Policy, Regulation, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Note on Cable Television Regulation Case Study


Examines the evolution of the U.S. cable television industry since its inception in the early 1950s. Particular emphasis is given to the roles played by technology, consumer demand, and regulation at both the local and federal level. Designed to facilitate a conceptual analysis of natural monopoly, market contestability, and intangible property rights. Financial statements from a major cable company are included to support a discussion of the basic economics of the cable television business. Focal points include legislative proposals to: 1) reregulate cable service rates, 2) allow local telephone companies to offer cable television service, and 3) to restrict the vertical integration of cable companies into programming. Updated through the passage of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992.


Case Authors : Willis Emmons, David Gossman

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Economy, Growth strategy, Policy, Regulation, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Note on Cable Television Regulation Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021425) -10021425 - -
Year 1 3463830 -6557595 3463830 0.9434 3267764
Year 2 3954078 -2603517 7417908 0.89 3519115
Year 3 3936714 1333197 11354622 0.8396 3305341
Year 4 3225439 4558636 14580061 0.7921 2554850
TOTAL 14580061 12647070




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2625645

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Cable Television have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Cable Television shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Note on Cable Television Regulation

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Cable Television often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Cable Television needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021425) -10021425 - -
Year 1 3463830 -6557595 3463830 0.8696 3012026
Year 2 3954078 -2603517 7417908 0.7561 2989851
Year 3 3936714 1333197 11354622 0.6575 2588453
Year 4 3225439 4558636 14580061 0.5718 1844155
TOTAL 10434486


The Net NPV after 4 years is 413061

(10434486 - 10021425 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021425) -10021425 - -
Year 1 3463830 -6557595 3463830 0.8333 2886525
Year 2 3954078 -2603517 7417908 0.6944 2745888
Year 3 3936714 1333197 11354622 0.5787 2278191
Year 4 3225439 4558636 14580061 0.4823 1555478
TOTAL 9466081


The Net NPV after 4 years is -555344

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9466081 - 10021425 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Cable Television to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Cable Television has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Cable Television can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Cable Television, then the stock price of the Cable Television should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Cable Television should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Note on Cable Television Regulation

References & Further Readings

Willis Emmons, David Gossman (2018), "Note on Cable Television Regulation Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Guangdong Ronsen A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Cnfc Fishery A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock


Axway SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Ningbo Tianlong Electronics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Fenix Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Knafaim SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Air Courier


Lockheed Martin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Aperam SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel


Nakakita Seisakusho SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Chuo Spring Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products