Profiting from Environmental Regulatory Uncertainty: Integrated Strategies for Competitive Advantage Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Profiting from Environmental Regulatory Uncertainty: Integrated Strategies for Competitive Advantage case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Profiting from Environmental Regulatory Uncertainty: Integrated Strategies for Competitive Advantage case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Adam Fremeth, Brian K. Richter. The Profiting from Environmental Regulatory Uncertainty: Integrated Strategies for Competitive Advantage (referred as “Environmental Uncertainty” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Managing uncertainty.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Profiting from Environmental Regulatory Uncertainty: Integrated Strategies for Competitive Advantage Case Study

This article offers two integrated strategies managers can use in the face of environmental regulatory uncertainty. As integrated strategies, they both recognize non-market forces while taking into account market realities. Advocating for pragmatic, progressive policies enables firms to shape future policy around existing environmental strengths; this strategy raises competitors' costs when competitors have yet to develop identical competencies. Systematically embracing advancing regulation enables firms to satisfy activists who are pressuring policymakers to force firms to conform to higher environmental standards in other jurisdictions; this strategy allows managers to adapt to coming regulation at their own pace while leveraging market competencies. This article presents four case studies that highlight how some firms have implemented these strategies, and why some have been successful at mitigating regulatory uncertainty and some have not.

Case Authors : Adam Fremeth, Brian K. Richter

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Managing uncertainty

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Profiting from Environmental Regulatory Uncertainty: Integrated Strategies for Competitive Advantage Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10024095)	-10024095	-	-
Year 1	3462915	-6561180	3462915	0.9434	3266901
Year 2	3968562	-2592618	7431477	0.89	3532006
Year 3	3949461	1356843	11380938	0.8396	3316044
Year 4	3239826	4596669	14620764	0.7921	2566246
TOTAL			14620764		12681196

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2657101

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Environmental Uncertainty shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Environmental Uncertainty have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Profiting from Environmental Regulatory Uncertainty: Integrated Strategies for Competitive Advantage

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Environmental Uncertainty often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Environmental Uncertainty needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10024095)	-10024095	-	-
Year 1	3462915	-6561180	3462915	0.8696	3011230
Year 2	3968562	-2592618	7431477	0.7561	3000803
Year 3	3949461	1356843	11380938	0.6575	2596835
Year 4	3239826	4596669	14620764	0.5718	1852381
TOTAL					10461249

The Net NPV after 4 years is 437154

(10461249 - 10024095 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10024095)	-10024095	-	-
Year 1	3462915	-6561180	3462915	0.8333	2885763
Year 2	3968562	-2592618	7431477	0.6944	2755946
Year 3	3949461	1356843	11380938	0.5787	2285568
Year 4	3239826	4596669	14620764	0.4823	1562416
TOTAL					9489692

The Net NPV after 4 years is -534403

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489692 - 10024095 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Environmental Uncertainty to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Environmental Uncertainty has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Environmental Uncertainty can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Environmental Uncertainty, then the stock price of the Environmental Uncertainty should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Environmental Uncertainty should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Profiting from Environmental Regulatory Uncertainty: Integrated Strategies for Competitive Advantage

References & Further Readings

Adam Fremeth, Brian K. Richter (2018), "Profiting from Environmental Regulatory Uncertainty: Integrated Strategies for Competitive Advantage Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.