Integrating Environmental and International Strategies in a World of Regulatory Turbulence Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Integrating Environmental and International Strategies in a World of Regulatory Turbulence case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Integrating Environmental and International Strategies in a World of Regulatory Turbulence case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Frank Wijen, Rob van Tulder. The Integrating Environmental and International Strategies in a World of Regulatory Turbulence (referred as “Regulatory Environmental” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Cross-cultural management, Managing uncertainty, Regulation.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Integrating Environmental and International Strategies in a World of Regulatory Turbulence Case Study

Companies operating in multiple countries face different and often changing regimes of environmental regulation. This regulatory turbulence raises the question of what environmental strategies multinational enterprises with a portfolio of divergent regulatory regimes should develop in relation to their international business expansion strategies. Forward-looking multinationals seeking to develop an effective environmental strategy should integrate relative regulatory stringency and international market interdependence. There are four environmental strategies that match different regulatory/market configurations for multinationals from both developed and emerging markets, and which identify the factors that drive strategic changes. The article presents a "regulatory turbulence tool" that describes relevant regulatory/market configurations and prescribes contingently effective, dynamic environmental strategies.

Case Authors : Frank Wijen, Rob van Tulder

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Cross-cultural management, Managing uncertainty, Regulation

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Integrating Environmental and International Strategies in a World of Regulatory Turbulence Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10019076)	-10019076	-	-
Year 1	3462695	-6556381	3462695	0.9434	3266693
Year 2	3971254	-2585127	7433949	0.89	3534402
Year 3	3967447	1382320	11401396	0.8396	3331145
Year 4	3247717	4630037	14649113	0.7921	2572496
TOTAL			14649113		12704736

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2685660

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Regulatory Environmental have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Regulatory Environmental shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Integrating Environmental and International Strategies in a World of Regulatory Turbulence

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Regulatory Environmental often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Regulatory Environmental needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10019076)	-10019076	-	-
Year 1	3462695	-6556381	3462695	0.8696	3011039
Year 2	3971254	-2585127	7433949	0.7561	3002839
Year 3	3967447	1382320	11401396	0.6575	2608661
Year 4	3247717	4630037	14649113	0.5718	1856893
TOTAL					10479431

The Net NPV after 4 years is 460355

(10479431 - 10019076 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10019076)	-10019076	-	-
Year 1	3462695	-6556381	3462695	0.8333	2885579
Year 2	3971254	-2585127	7433949	0.6944	2757815
Year 3	3967447	1382320	11401396	0.5787	2295976
Year 4	3247717	4630037	14649113	0.4823	1566222
TOTAL					9505592

The Net NPV after 4 years is -513484

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9505592 - 10019076 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Regulatory Environmental to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Regulatory Environmental has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Regulatory Environmental can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Regulatory Environmental, then the stock price of the Regulatory Environmental should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Regulatory Environmental should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Integrating Environmental and International Strategies in a World of Regulatory Turbulence

References & Further Readings

Frank Wijen, Rob van Tulder (2018), "Integrating Environmental and International Strategies in a World of Regulatory Turbulence Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.