Colby General Hospital (D): A Performance Improvement System Stalls Out Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Colby General Hospital (D): A Performance Improvement System Stalls Out case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Colby General Hospital (D): A Performance Improvement System Stalls Out case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert D. Landel, Derrick Moreira. The Colby General Hospital (D): A Performance Improvement System Stalls Out (referred as “Improvement Simulation” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Communication. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Health.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Colby General Hospital (D): A Performance Improvement System Stalls Out Case Study

This case, an abridgment of the A, B, and C cases (UV3505, UV3506, UV3507), presents an operating challenge: how does an organization sustain the initial progress achieved through its new quality-improvement system. Nurses and other clinical staff feel that the culture does not support the acknowledgment of mistakes, and the operations manager is trying to ascertain whether this "blame-game" environment is the cause of the improvement slowdown or whether there are other factors. Students are asked to apply systems-thinking tools to reveal their hypotheses of the causes of the improvement problem and to critique one representation of the underlying system structure. A systems-dynamics model can be used in class or as a preparation assignment. The simulation model enables students to develop a deeper understanding of the systems-dynamics behavior. This case is best used in a class where the emphasis is on systems mapping and not on simulation modeling. It can be used to discuss and critique how the hospital manager has tackled the improvement problem and developed a model representation of the system. It can also be used to discuss how a manager assists in the quantification of systems relationships (dominated by soft variables) and in the development of a simulation model.

Case Authors : Robert D. Landel, Derrick Moreira

Topic : Communication

Related Areas : Health

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Colby General Hospital (D): A Performance Improvement System Stalls Out Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10011604)	-10011604	-	-
Year 1	3469438	-6542166	3469438	0.9434	3273055
Year 2	3980768	-2561398	7450206	0.89	3542869
Year 3	3970818	1409420	11421024	0.8396	3333975
Year 4	3236659	4646079	14657683	0.7921	2563737
TOTAL			14657683		12713637

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2702033

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Improvement Simulation have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Improvement Simulation shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Colby General Hospital (D): A Performance Improvement System Stalls Out

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Communication Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Improvement Simulation often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Improvement Simulation needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10011604)	-10011604	-	-
Year 1	3469438	-6542166	3469438	0.8696	3016903
Year 2	3980768	-2561398	7450206	0.7561	3010033
Year 3	3970818	1409420	11421024	0.6575	2610877
Year 4	3236659	4646079	14657683	0.5718	1850570
TOTAL					10488383

The Net NPV after 4 years is 476779

(10488383 - 10011604 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10011604)	-10011604	-	-
Year 1	3469438	-6542166	3469438	0.8333	2891198
Year 2	3980768	-2561398	7450206	0.6944	2764422
Year 3	3970818	1409420	11421024	0.5787	2297927
Year 4	3236659	4646079	14657683	0.4823	1560889
TOTAL					9514436

The Net NPV after 4 years is -497168

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9514436 - 10011604 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Improvement Simulation to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Improvement Simulation has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Improvement Simulation can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Improvement Simulation, then the stock price of the Improvement Simulation should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Improvement Simulation should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Colby General Hospital (D): A Performance Improvement System Stalls Out

References & Further Readings

Robert D. Landel, Derrick Moreira (2018), "Colby General Hospital (D): A Performance Improvement System Stalls Out Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.