×




Russell Reynolds Associates--1999 Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Russell Reynolds Associates--1999 case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Russell Reynolds Associates--1999 case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Tarun Khanna, Krishna G. Palepu, Rakesh Khurana. The Russell Reynolds Associates--1999 (referred as “Reynolds Russell” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Globalization, Growth strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Russell Reynolds Associates--1999 Case Study


This case is accompanied by a Video Short that can be shown in class or included in a digital coursepack. Instructors should consider the timing of making the video available to students, as it may reveal key case details.The president and CEO of Russell Reynolds examined the company's expansion strategy, especially in emerging markets. He evalulates how quickly the company should open new offices abroad and in which countries.


Case Authors : Tarun Khanna, Krishna G. Palepu, Rakesh Khurana

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Globalization, Growth strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Russell Reynolds Associates--1999 Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026423) -10026423 - -
Year 1 3460263 -6566160 3460263 0.9434 3264399
Year 2 3965919 -2600241 7426182 0.89 3529654
Year 3 3944819 1344578 11371001 0.8396 3312146
Year 4 3234935 4579513 14605936 0.7921 2562372
TOTAL 14605936 12668570




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2642147

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Reynolds Russell have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Reynolds Russell shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Russell Reynolds Associates--1999

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Reynolds Russell often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Reynolds Russell needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026423) -10026423 - -
Year 1 3460263 -6566160 3460263 0.8696 3008924
Year 2 3965919 -2600241 7426182 0.7561 2998805
Year 3 3944819 1344578 11371001 0.6575 2593783
Year 4 3234935 4579513 14605936 0.5718 1849585
TOTAL 10451096


The Net NPV after 4 years is 424673

(10451096 - 10026423 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026423) -10026423 - -
Year 1 3460263 -6566160 3460263 0.8333 2883553
Year 2 3965919 -2600241 7426182 0.6944 2754110
Year 3 3944819 1344578 11371001 0.5787 2282881
Year 4 3234935 4579513 14605936 0.4823 1560057
TOTAL 9480602


The Net NPV after 4 years is -545821

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9480602 - 10026423 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Reynolds Russell to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Reynolds Russell has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Reynolds Russell can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Reynolds Russell, then the stock price of the Reynolds Russell should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Reynolds Russell should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Russell Reynolds Associates--1999

References & Further Readings

Tarun Khanna, Krishna G. Palepu, Rakesh Khurana (2018), "Russell Reynolds Associates--1999 Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Primoris SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Broo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Sojitz Corp. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Mineralrite Corporat SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Link Net SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


IKD A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Avista Healthcare Public SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services