×




Note on Deregulation and Social Obligations: Universal Service, Access Pricing, and Competitive Dynamics in U.S. Telecommunications Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Note on Deregulation and Social Obligations: Universal Service, Access Pricing, and Competitive Dynamics in U.S. Telecommunications case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Note on Deregulation and Social Obligations: Universal Service, Access Pricing, and Competitive Dynamics in U.S. Telecommunications case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Alexander Dyck, Indra A. Reinbergs. The Note on Deregulation and Social Obligations: Universal Service, Access Pricing, and Competitive Dynamics in U.S. Telecommunications (referred as “Obligations Deregulation” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Note on Deregulation and Social Obligations: Universal Service, Access Pricing, and Competitive Dynamics in U.S. Telecommunications Case Study


Can deregulation and the unleashing of competitive forces be combined with continued social obligations such as a duty to serve? This note uses the experience of U.S. telecommunications to illustrate the existence and influence of social obligations. Recognizing these obligations enhances understanding of the dynamics of deregulation. Finishes with a discussion of recent issues in telecom deregulation and how social obligations continue to play a part in determining regulatory responses. Focuses exclusively on telecommunications, although the same points--that social obligations exist in regulated industries and that finding a way to continue to address these obligations in a more competitive environment is a major element of regulatory reforms--apply to many other regulated industries.


Case Authors : Alexander Dyck, Indra A. Reinbergs

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Note on Deregulation and Social Obligations: Universal Service, Access Pricing, and Competitive Dynamics in U.S. Telecommunications Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016042) -10016042 - -
Year 1 3458856 -6557186 3458856 0.9434 3263072
Year 2 3966665 -2590521 7425521 0.89 3530318
Year 3 3943323 1352802 11368844 0.8396 3310890
Year 4 3231578 4584380 14600422 0.7921 2559712
TOTAL 14600422 12663992




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2647950

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Obligations Deregulation shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Obligations Deregulation have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Note on Deregulation and Social Obligations: Universal Service, Access Pricing, and Competitive Dynamics in U.S. Telecommunications

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Obligations Deregulation often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Obligations Deregulation needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016042) -10016042 - -
Year 1 3458856 -6557186 3458856 0.8696 3007701
Year 2 3966665 -2590521 7425521 0.7561 2999369
Year 3 3943323 1352802 11368844 0.6575 2592799
Year 4 3231578 4584380 14600422 0.5718 1847665
TOTAL 10447534


The Net NPV after 4 years is 431492

(10447534 - 10016042 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016042) -10016042 - -
Year 1 3458856 -6557186 3458856 0.8333 2882380
Year 2 3966665 -2590521 7425521 0.6944 2754628
Year 3 3943323 1352802 11368844 0.5787 2282016
Year 4 3231578 4584380 14600422 0.4823 1558438
TOTAL 9477463


The Net NPV after 4 years is -538579

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9477463 - 10016042 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Obligations Deregulation to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Obligations Deregulation has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Obligations Deregulation can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Obligations Deregulation, then the stock price of the Obligations Deregulation should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Obligations Deregulation should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Note on Deregulation and Social Obligations: Universal Service, Access Pricing, and Competitive Dynamics in U.S. Telecommunications

References & Further Readings

Alexander Dyck, Indra A. Reinbergs (2018), "Note on Deregulation and Social Obligations: Universal Service, Access Pricing, and Competitive Dynamics in U.S. Telecommunications Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Bansal Multiflex SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Burelle SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Hubei Xingfa Chemicals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Richardson Electronics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Nan Haioration SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Aba Chemicals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Printnet SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Catalog & Mail Order)


Puma SE SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Footwear


TWC Enterprises SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Recreational Activities


ST Engineering SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense