×




Governing the City: Unleashing Value from the Business Ecosystem Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Governing the City: Unleashing Value from the Business Ecosystem case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Governing the City: Unleashing Value from the Business Ecosystem case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ivanka Visnjic, Carmelo Cennamo, Andy Neely, Nikola Visnjic. The Governing the City: Unleashing Value from the Business Ecosystem (referred as “City Ecosystem” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Government, Innovation.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Governing the City: Unleashing Value from the Business Ecosystem Case Study


Governing a city is arguably one of the most complex management tasks facing organizational leaders. Based on an analysis of Vienna, London, and Chicago, this article demonstrates that city leaders treat cities as ecosystems, structured and governed either as "extended enterprises" where inputs from specialized organizations are coordinated and integrated into the final service or as "platform markets" where direct interactions between third-party service providers and citizens are facilitated by the city leaders. If cities are viewed as the "ecosystem of ecosystems," then successful city governance requires an orchestration approach where leaders choose the appropriate structure and manage the ecosystem dynamically in a constantly changing environment.


Case Authors : Ivanka Visnjic, Carmelo Cennamo, Andy Neely, Nikola Visnjic

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Government, Innovation




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Governing the City: Unleashing Value from the Business Ecosystem Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005840) -10005840 - -
Year 1 3456371 -6549469 3456371 0.9434 3260727
Year 2 3972513 -2576956 7428884 0.89 3535522
Year 3 3970732 1393776 11399616 0.8396 3333903
Year 4 3222875 4616651 14622491 0.7921 2552819
TOTAL 14622491 12682972




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2677132

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. City Ecosystem shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of City Ecosystem have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Governing the City: Unleashing Value from the Business Ecosystem

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at City Ecosystem often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at City Ecosystem needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005840) -10005840 - -
Year 1 3456371 -6549469 3456371 0.8696 3005540
Year 2 3972513 -2576956 7428884 0.7561 3003791
Year 3 3970732 1393776 11399616 0.6575 2610821
Year 4 3222875 4616651 14622491 0.5718 1842689
TOTAL 10462841


The Net NPV after 4 years is 457001

(10462841 - 10005840 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005840) -10005840 - -
Year 1 3456371 -6549469 3456371 0.8333 2880309
Year 2 3972513 -2576956 7428884 0.6944 2758690
Year 3 3970732 1393776 11399616 0.5787 2297877
Year 4 3222875 4616651 14622491 0.4823 1554241
TOTAL 9491117


The Net NPV after 4 years is -514723

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9491117 - 10005840 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of City Ecosystem to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of City Ecosystem has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at City Ecosystem can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at City Ecosystem, then the stock price of the City Ecosystem should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at City Ecosystem should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Governing the City: Unleashing Value from the Business Ecosystem

References & Further Readings

Ivanka Visnjic, Carmelo Cennamo, Andy Neely, Nikola Visnjic (2018), "Governing the City: Unleashing Value from the Business Ecosystem Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Cloud Invest SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Jakarta Kyoei SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel


Ferroglobe SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Arista Investors A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Accident & Health)


Yijiahe Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Sika SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


NexGen Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining