×




Foxy Originals - Expansion into the U.S. Market Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Foxy Originals - Expansion into the U.S. Market case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Foxy Originals - Expansion into the U.S. Market case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Elizabeth M.A. Grasby, Nina Gupta. The Foxy Originals - Expansion into the U.S. Market (referred as “Contribution Margin” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial analysis, Marketing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Foxy Originals - Expansion into the U.S. Market Case Study


This is part of the subset of Ivey cases and technical notes written for Introductory-Level courses.A successful Canadian jewelry manufacturer and distributor contemplates entering the U.S. market and how best to do it. Students are required to: 1) identify costs relevant to the decision and categorize them as either investments, fixed costs or variable costs; 2) calculate unit contribution, contribution-margin ratio and weighted-average-contribution-margin rates; 3) perform a breakeven analysis and interpret its meaning using relevant parameters; 4) project profitability of a chosen distribution strategy; and 5) perform sensitivity analysis with respect to the expected sales level. Students are required to understand and analyse the opportunities and risks associated with entering a new geographic market and combine their qualitative and quantitative analysis when deciding which distribution strategy to pursue.


Case Authors : Elizabeth M.A. Grasby, Nina Gupta

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Financial analysis, Marketing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Foxy Originals - Expansion into the U.S. Market Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007307) -10007307 - -
Year 1 3456344 -6550963 3456344 0.9434 3260702
Year 2 3970772 -2580191 7427116 0.89 3533973
Year 3 3967426 1387235 11394542 0.8396 3331127
Year 4 3222801 4610036 14617343 0.7921 2552760
TOTAL 14617343 12678562




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2671255

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Contribution Margin shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Contribution Margin have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Foxy Originals - Expansion into the U.S. Market

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Contribution Margin often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Contribution Margin needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007307) -10007307 - -
Year 1 3456344 -6550963 3456344 0.8696 3005517
Year 2 3970772 -2580191 7427116 0.7561 3002474
Year 3 3967426 1387235 11394542 0.6575 2608647
Year 4 3222801 4610036 14617343 0.5718 1842647
TOTAL 10459285


The Net NPV after 4 years is 451978

(10459285 - 10007307 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007307) -10007307 - -
Year 1 3456344 -6550963 3456344 0.8333 2880287
Year 2 3970772 -2580191 7427116 0.6944 2757481
Year 3 3967426 1387235 11394542 0.5787 2295964
Year 4 3222801 4610036 14617343 0.4823 1554206
TOTAL 9487937


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519370

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487937 - 10007307 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Contribution Margin to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Contribution Margin has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Contribution Margin can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Contribution Margin, then the stock price of the Contribution Margin should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Contribution Margin should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Foxy Originals - Expansion into the U.S. Market

References & Further Readings

Elizabeth M.A. Grasby, Nina Gupta (2018), "Foxy Originals - Expansion into the U.S. Market Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Archidply Industries Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Macquarie SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Lonking Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Zhejiang Hangmin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Technofab Engineering Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Artgo Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Qurient SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Pixela SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


Spring Ventures SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services