×




Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labor Practice: The adidas Connection Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labor Practice: The adidas Connection case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labor Practice: The adidas Connection case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Stephen J. Frenkel, Duncan Scott. The Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labor Practice: The adidas Connection (referred as “Adidas Labor” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Globalization, Labor, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labor Practice: The adidas Connection Case Study


Comprising networked organizations that span advanced and developing countries, the athletic footwear sector is at the cutting edge of globalization. An important dimension of corporate responsibility is setting and maintaining labor standards for contractors' employees in countries where workers have little or no legal protection against exploitation. This article examines how adidas, the industry's No. 2 firm, has utilized a code of labor practice to regulate the labor standards of its main manufacturing suppliers. A comparative analysis of a matched sample of two contractors in China shows that although the code requirements were met in both cases, relationships with adidas not only differed but also made a difference. Compared with compliance-type relationships, collaborative global firm-contractor ties encourage higher workplace performance and better employment relations in contractor factories.


Case Authors : Stephen J. Frenkel, Duncan Scott

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Globalization, Labor, Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labor Practice: The adidas Connection Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020029) -10020029 - -
Year 1 3462257 -6557772 3462257 0.9434 3266280
Year 2 3971970 -2585802 7434227 0.89 3535039
Year 3 3957486 1371684 11391713 0.8396 3322782
Year 4 3247189 4618873 14638902 0.7921 2572078
TOTAL 14638902 12696179




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2676150

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Adidas Labor have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Adidas Labor shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labor Practice: The adidas Connection

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Adidas Labor often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Adidas Labor needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020029) -10020029 - -
Year 1 3462257 -6557772 3462257 0.8696 3010658
Year 2 3971970 -2585802 7434227 0.7561 3003380
Year 3 3957486 1371684 11391713 0.6575 2602111
Year 4 3247189 4618873 14638902 0.5718 1856591
TOTAL 10472740


The Net NPV after 4 years is 452711

(10472740 - 10020029 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020029) -10020029 - -
Year 1 3462257 -6557772 3462257 0.8333 2885214
Year 2 3971970 -2585802 7434227 0.6944 2758313
Year 3 3957486 1371684 11391713 0.5787 2290212
Year 4 3247189 4618873 14638902 0.4823 1565967
TOTAL 9499705


The Net NPV after 4 years is -520324

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9499705 - 10020029 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Adidas Labor to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Adidas Labor has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Adidas Labor can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Adidas Labor, then the stock price of the Adidas Labor should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Adidas Labor should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labor Practice: The adidas Connection

References & Further Readings

Stephen J. Frenkel, Duncan Scott (2018), "Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labor Practice: The adidas Connection Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Marathon Patent SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


New City Development SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


G&E Biotech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


GENORAY SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


ADD Industry Zhejiang SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Vadivarhe Speciality Chemicals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Spok Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


DeGem SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Jewelry & Silverware