×




Using Social and Economic Incentives to Discourage Chinese Suppliers From Product Adulteration Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Using Social and Economic Incentives to Discourage Chinese Suppliers From Product Adulteration case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Using Social and Economic Incentives to Discourage Chinese Suppliers From Product Adulteration case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Christopher S. Tang, Volodymyr Babich. The Using Social and Economic Incentives to Discourage Chinese Suppliers From Product Adulteration (referred as “Adulteration Adulterated” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Product development.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Using Social and Economic Incentives to Discourage Chinese Suppliers From Product Adulteration Case Study


The American public raised serious concerns about product safety in 2007, when the number of product recalls broke a new record. Following a temporary drop in 2008, both the number and retail value of recalled units have been increasing, despite various efforts exerted by government agencies and private companies to combat this trend. Currently, many countries--including China itself--are expressing serious concern over adulterated or unsafe food made or sold in China. What are the underlying reasons for some Chinese suppliers to adulterate product? When law enforcement is still weak in China, what can western manufacturers do to reduce the risk of product adulteration? To develop effective deterrence mechanisms, we first identify four underlying factors that create incentives for some Chinese suppliers to produce unsafe products. Then we propose ideas to discourage Chinese suppliers from producing adulterated products based on two underlying strategies: (1) creating economic incentives through contingent payments, and (2) creating a social incentive by threatening public exposure through the power of the Internet and social networking sites.


Case Authors : Christopher S. Tang, Volodymyr Babich

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Product development




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Using Social and Economic Incentives to Discourage Chinese Suppliers From Product Adulteration Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028207) -10028207 - -
Year 1 3456430 -6571777 3456430 0.9434 3260783
Year 2 3961608 -2610169 7418038 0.89 3525817
Year 3 3949045 1338876 11367083 0.8396 3315694
Year 4 3231304 4570180 14598387 0.7921 2559495
TOTAL 14598387 12661790




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2633583

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Adulteration Adulterated shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Adulteration Adulterated have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Using Social and Economic Incentives to Discourage Chinese Suppliers From Product Adulteration

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Adulteration Adulterated often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Adulteration Adulterated needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028207) -10028207 - -
Year 1 3456430 -6571777 3456430 0.8696 3005591
Year 2 3961608 -2610169 7418038 0.7561 2995545
Year 3 3949045 1338876 11367083 0.6575 2596561
Year 4 3231304 4570180 14598387 0.5718 1847509
TOTAL 10445206


The Net NPV after 4 years is 416999

(10445206 - 10028207 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028207) -10028207 - -
Year 1 3456430 -6571777 3456430 0.8333 2880358
Year 2 3961608 -2610169 7418038 0.6944 2751117
Year 3 3949045 1338876 11367083 0.5787 2285327
Year 4 3231304 4570180 14598387 0.4823 1558306
TOTAL 9475108


The Net NPV after 4 years is -553099

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9475108 - 10028207 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Adulteration Adulterated to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Adulteration Adulterated has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Adulteration Adulterated can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Adulteration Adulterated, then the stock price of the Adulteration Adulterated should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Adulteration Adulterated should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Using Social and Economic Incentives to Discourage Chinese Suppliers From Product Adulteration

References & Further Readings

Christopher S. Tang, Volodymyr Babich (2018), "Using Social and Economic Incentives to Discourage Chinese Suppliers From Product Adulteration Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Betta Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


New Home Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


S.Ishimitsu & SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Ohara Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Capital Sta SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Tomson SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


JBF Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Shenglu Telecom A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Tiger SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Bekasi Asri Pemula SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services