×




Santander Consumer Finance Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Santander Consumer Finance case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Santander Consumer Finance case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Gunnar Trumbull, Elena Corsi, Andrew Barron. The Santander Consumer Finance (referred as “Santander Finance” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, International business, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Santander Consumer Finance Case Study


To maximize their effectiveness, color cases should be printed in color.A Spanish company has to decide if they should expand into the fragmented European consumer finance market and has to make important organizational strategy decisions, in the midst of the world economic downturn that followed the 2007 US credit crunch. Since 2002, the consumer finance branch of the Spanish banking Grupo Santander, Santander Consumer Finance (SCF) had grown into one of the largest European consumer finance companies capturing the recent growth in Europe of the consumer finance market. Against a background of growing concern about the sustainability of household debt levels in Europe and the United States, in 2008 the new CEO, Magda Salarich FernA¡ndez de Valderrama, had to decide if this was the right time to expand or if instead she should focus on consolidation. She was also facing important organizational strategy decisions. Which functions should be left to national affiliates to decide, and which should be centralized at headquarters? What processes should be standardized, and which left to local initiatives?


Case Authors : Gunnar Trumbull, Elena Corsi, Andrew Barron

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : International business, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Santander Consumer Finance Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027498) -10027498 - -
Year 1 3467096 -6560402 3467096 0.9434 3270845
Year 2 3982360 -2578042 7449456 0.89 3544286
Year 3 3962417 1384375 11411873 0.8396 3326922
Year 4 3244952 4629327 14656825 0.7921 2570306
TOTAL 14656825 12712359




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2684861

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Santander Finance shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Santander Finance have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Santander Consumer Finance

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Santander Finance often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Santander Finance needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027498) -10027498 - -
Year 1 3467096 -6560402 3467096 0.8696 3014866
Year 2 3982360 -2578042 7449456 0.7561 3011236
Year 3 3962417 1384375 11411873 0.6575 2605353
Year 4 3244952 4629327 14656825 0.5718 1855312
TOTAL 10486768


The Net NPV after 4 years is 459270

(10486768 - 10027498 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027498) -10027498 - -
Year 1 3467096 -6560402 3467096 0.8333 2889247
Year 2 3982360 -2578042 7449456 0.6944 2765528
Year 3 3962417 1384375 11411873 0.5787 2293065
Year 4 3244952 4629327 14656825 0.4823 1564888
TOTAL 9512728


The Net NPV after 4 years is -514770

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9512728 - 10027498 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Santander Finance to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Santander Finance has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Santander Finance can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Santander Finance, then the stock price of the Santander Finance should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Santander Finance should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Santander Consumer Finance

References & Further Readings

Gunnar Trumbull, Elena Corsi, Andrew Barron (2018), "Santander Consumer Finance Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Gabia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Bowleven SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Gamecard Joyco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Hydroponics Company SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Liaoning Wellhope Agri-Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Techno Alpha SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Jarvis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Geo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Coheris SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Seri Industrial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Jindo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories