×




The Branding Challenges of Asian Manufacturing Firms Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Branding Challenges of Asian Manufacturing Firms case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Branding Challenges of Asian Manufacturing Firms case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Andreas Birnik, Anna-Karin Birnik, Jagdish Sheth. The The Branding Challenges of Asian Manufacturing Firms (referred as “Interbrand's Manufacturing” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Manufacturing, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Branding Challenges of Asian Manufacturing Firms Case Study


During the past quarter of a century, Asia has risen to become the world's factory. This trend has, however, coincided with the relative decline in value of manufacturing compared to other value adding activities, including R&D, design, and branding. This significant "value shift" has eroded the margins of manufacturing firms and sparked considerable interest among executives in Asia to design, brand, and market their own products. To date, though, this transition from being manufacturing oriented to becoming brand owners has largely only been accomplished by Japanese and Korean firms. In the rest of Asia-including in the rising giants of China and India-there are very few valuable brands. In fact, there is not a single Asian brand from a country other than Japan and Korea in Interbrand's 2008 valuation of the world's top 100 brands. Our article discusses, in depth, the challenges that Asian manufacturing firms encounter as they try to become "branders" and how these challenges can be overcome. Based on our collaboration spanning academia and consulting, we have been able to tap a wealth of information made available through research, case studies, and Interbrand's database of completed brand related assignments across Asia.


Case Authors : Andreas Birnik, Anna-Karin Birnik, Jagdish Sheth

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Manufacturing, Strategy execution




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Branding Challenges of Asian Manufacturing Firms Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012437) -10012437 - -
Year 1 3456296 -6556141 3456296 0.9434 3260657
Year 2 3971576 -2584565 7427872 0.89 3534689
Year 3 3941158 1356593 11369030 0.8396 3309072
Year 4 3238805 4595398 14607835 0.7921 2565437
TOTAL 14607835 12669854




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2657417

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Interbrand's Manufacturing shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Interbrand's Manufacturing have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Branding Challenges of Asian Manufacturing Firms

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Interbrand's Manufacturing often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Interbrand's Manufacturing needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012437) -10012437 - -
Year 1 3456296 -6556141 3456296 0.8696 3005475
Year 2 3971576 -2584565 7427872 0.7561 3003082
Year 3 3941158 1356593 11369030 0.6575 2591375
Year 4 3238805 4595398 14607835 0.5718 1851797
TOTAL 10451729


The Net NPV after 4 years is 439292

(10451729 - 10012437 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012437) -10012437 - -
Year 1 3456296 -6556141 3456296 0.8333 2880247
Year 2 3971576 -2584565 7427872 0.6944 2758039
Year 3 3941158 1356593 11369030 0.5787 2280763
Year 4 3238805 4595398 14607835 0.4823 1561924
TOTAL 9480972


The Net NPV after 4 years is -531465

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9480972 - 10012437 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Interbrand's Manufacturing to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Interbrand's Manufacturing has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Interbrand's Manufacturing can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Interbrand's Manufacturing, then the stock price of the Interbrand's Manufacturing should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Interbrand's Manufacturing should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Branding Challenges of Asian Manufacturing Firms

References & Further Readings

Andreas Birnik, Anna-Karin Birnik, Jagdish Sheth (2018), "The Branding Challenges of Asian Manufacturing Firms Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


AstraZeneca ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Tern PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


OKins Electronics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Medical Developments SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Boc Aviation SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Rental & Leasing


Segue Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Shipping Corporation SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Braemar Hotel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Union Tool Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Bonne SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services