×




Latvia: Economic Strategy after EU Accession Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Latvia: Economic Strategy after EU Accession case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Latvia: Economic Strategy after EU Accession case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael E. Porter, Christian H.M. Ketels. The Latvia: Economic Strategy after EU Accession (referred as “Latvia Eu” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Latvia: Economic Strategy after EU Accession Case Study


Describes the economic development of Latvia, a small eastern European country on the shores of the Baltic Sea, from regaining independence in 1991 to European Union (EU) accession in 2004 and is set on May 1st, 2004, the day Latvia became an EU member. Latvia had achieved strong growth since regaining independence from the Soviet Union in 1990. Describes Latvia's economic development over this period, discussing the economic policy efforts that have taken place and includes general information on the country, its history and politics, and the business environment that companies faced in 2004. A special focus is the influence that the EU accession process has on the Latvian economy and on economic policy choices in the country. Challenges students to discuss how the environment changes as EU membership is achieved, and which new priorities the country might need to define for its economic policy.


Case Authors : Michael E. Porter, Christian H.M. Ketels

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Latvia: Economic Strategy after EU Accession Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000645) -10000645 - -
Year 1 3471617 -6529028 3471617 0.9434 3275110
Year 2 3974686 -2554342 7446303 0.89 3537456
Year 3 3949851 1395509 11396154 0.8396 3316371
Year 4 3238618 4634127 14634772 0.7921 2565289
TOTAL 14634772 12694227




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2693582

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Latvia Eu shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Latvia Eu have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Latvia: Economic Strategy after EU Accession

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Latvia Eu often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Latvia Eu needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000645) -10000645 - -
Year 1 3471617 -6529028 3471617 0.8696 3018797
Year 2 3974686 -2554342 7446303 0.7561 3005434
Year 3 3949851 1395509 11396154 0.6575 2597091
Year 4 3238618 4634127 14634772 0.5718 1851690
TOTAL 10473013


The Net NPV after 4 years is 472368

(10473013 - 10000645 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000645) -10000645 - -
Year 1 3471617 -6529028 3471617 0.8333 2893014
Year 2 3974686 -2554342 7446303 0.6944 2760199
Year 3 3949851 1395509 11396154 0.5787 2285793
Year 4 3238618 4634127 14634772 0.4823 1561834
TOTAL 9500840


The Net NPV after 4 years is -499805

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9500840 - 10000645 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Latvia Eu to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Latvia Eu has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Latvia Eu can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Latvia Eu, then the stock price of the Latvia Eu should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Latvia Eu should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Latvia: Economic Strategy after EU Accession

References & Further Readings

Michael E. Porter, Christian H.M. Ketels (2018), "Latvia: Economic Strategy after EU Accession Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


HRnetGroup SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Motherson Sumi Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Unisplendour Technology SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Vaalco Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Gjensidige Forsikring SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Novation Hldgs Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


SingTel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Dawn SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


London City Equities Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services