Airlines' Flexibility in Facing Regulatory Uncertainty: To Anticipate or Adapt Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Airlines' Flexibility in Facing Regulatory Uncertainty: To Anticipate or Adapt case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Airlines' Flexibility in Facing Regulatory Uncertainty: To Anticipate or Adapt case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Christian Engau, Volker H. Hoffmann, Timo Busch. The Airlines' Flexibility in Facing Regulatory Uncertainty: To Anticipate or Adapt (referred as “Regulatory Flexibility” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Managing uncertainty, Operations management, Organizational culture.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Airlines' Flexibility in Facing Regulatory Uncertainty: To Anticipate or Adapt Case Study

Coping with uncertainty is a fundamental challenge for firms. One way they can respond is by building up strategic flexibility. By looking at airlines' flexibility responses to regulatory uncertainty associated with their inclusion in the European Union Emission Trading Scheme, this article shows that firms can respond to regulatory uncertainty by developing such flexibility in two ways: they can either anticipate the potential consequences of changing regulatory conditions and try to prepare for them; or they can adapt quickly and efficiently to them once the regulatory situation has become clear. By examining evidence from nine case studies, the article identifies the organizational capabilities required to pursue an anticipatory or adaptive strategy and demonstrates that each type of response requires a specific bundle of capabilities.

Case Authors : Christian Engau, Volker H. Hoffmann, Timo Busch

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Managing uncertainty, Operations management, Organizational culture

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Airlines' Flexibility in Facing Regulatory Uncertainty: To Anticipate or Adapt Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10026239)	-10026239	-	-
Year 1	3444042	-6582197	3444042	0.9434	3249096
Year 2	3969024	-2613173	7413066	0.89	3532417
Year 3	3939384	1326211	11352450	0.8396	3307583
Year 4	3244679	4570890	14597129	0.7921	2570090
TOTAL			14597129		12659186

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2632947

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Regulatory Flexibility shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Regulatory Flexibility have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Airlines' Flexibility in Facing Regulatory Uncertainty: To Anticipate or Adapt

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Regulatory Flexibility often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Regulatory Flexibility needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10026239)	-10026239	-	-
Year 1	3444042	-6582197	3444042	0.8696	2994819
Year 2	3969024	-2613173	7413066	0.7561	3001152
Year 3	3939384	1326211	11352450	0.6575	2590209
Year 4	3244679	4570890	14597129	0.5718	1855156
TOTAL					10441336

The Net NPV after 4 years is 415097

(10441336 - 10026239 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10026239)	-10026239	-	-
Year 1	3444042	-6582197	3444042	0.8333	2870035
Year 2	3969024	-2613173	7413066	0.6944	2756267
Year 3	3939384	1326211	11352450	0.5787	2279736
Year 4	3244679	4570890	14597129	0.4823	1564756
TOTAL					9470794

The Net NPV after 4 years is -555445

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9470794 - 10026239 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Regulatory Flexibility to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Regulatory Flexibility has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Regulatory Flexibility can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Regulatory Flexibility, then the stock price of the Regulatory Flexibility should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Regulatory Flexibility should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Airlines' Flexibility in Facing Regulatory Uncertainty: To Anticipate or Adapt

References & Further Readings

Christian Engau, Volker H. Hoffmann, Timo Busch (2018), "Airlines' Flexibility in Facing Regulatory Uncertainty: To Anticipate or Adapt Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.