×




College Summit: Rethinking the Relationship Between Growth and Impact Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for College Summit: Rethinking the Relationship Between Growth and Impact case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. College Summit: Rethinking the Relationship Between Growth and Impact case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Stacey Childress, Geoff Marietta. The College Summit: Rethinking the Relationship Between Growth and Impact (referred as “Summit College” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Growth strategy, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of College Summit: Rethinking the Relationship Between Growth and Impact Case Study


To maximize their effectiveness, color cases should be printed in color.College Summit, a nonprofit organization "committed to the day when every student who can make it in college makes it to college," was faced with an important strategic decision. After growing rapidly at more than 30% a year for the last several years, Founder and CEO J.B. Schramm, Chief Strategy Officer Mora Segal, and the College Summit team must now decide whether or not to dramatically redefine their organization's theory of change. College Summit could continue to "get results and grow real fast" or make the bold choice to re-conceptualize its strategy to focus on system-level change. While there were numerous risks to pursuing the alternative strategy, for Schramm and Segal, the possibility of helping redefine the purpose of secondary education might be too significant to ignore.


Case Authors : Stacey Childress, Geoff Marietta

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Growth strategy, Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for College Summit: Rethinking the Relationship Between Growth and Impact Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029844) -10029844 - -
Year 1 3465421 -6564423 3465421 0.9434 3269265
Year 2 3967967 -2596456 7433388 0.89 3531477
Year 3 3936108 1339652 11369496 0.8396 3304832
Year 4 3249867 4589519 14619363 0.7921 2574199
TOTAL 14619363 12679773




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2649929

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Summit College shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Summit College have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of College Summit: Rethinking the Relationship Between Growth and Impact

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Summit College often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Summit College needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029844) -10029844 - -
Year 1 3465421 -6564423 3465421 0.8696 3013410
Year 2 3967967 -2596456 7433388 0.7561 3000353
Year 3 3936108 1339652 11369496 0.6575 2588055
Year 4 3249867 4589519 14619363 0.5718 1858122
TOTAL 10459940


The Net NPV after 4 years is 430096

(10459940 - 10029844 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029844) -10029844 - -
Year 1 3465421 -6564423 3465421 0.8333 2887851
Year 2 3967967 -2596456 7433388 0.6944 2755533
Year 3 3936108 1339652 11369496 0.5787 2277840
Year 4 3249867 4589519 14619363 0.4823 1567258
TOTAL 9488482


The Net NPV after 4 years is -541362

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488482 - 10029844 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Summit College to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Summit College has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Summit College can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Summit College, then the stock price of the Summit College should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Summit College should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of College Summit: Rethinking the Relationship Between Growth and Impact

References & Further Readings

Stacey Childress, Geoff Marietta (2018), "College Summit: Rethinking the Relationship Between Growth and Impact Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Link Net SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Granite Oil SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Godewind Immobilien SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


SatrecInitiative SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Ienergizer SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Green Planet Grp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Sunsuria Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Acorn SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment