Kirk Riedinger and Jamie Turner Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Kirk Riedinger and Jamie Turner case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Kirk Riedinger and Jamie Turner case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by H. Irving Grousbeck, David Dodson. The Kirk Riedinger and Jamie Turner (referred as “Kirk Jamie” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial analysis, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Kirk Riedinger and Jamie Turner Case Study

Discusses the trials and eventual success of two young Harvard MBAs who chose to purchase a company immediately upon graduation from their MBA program. Having no assets of their own, Kirk and Jamie raised a search fund to meet expenses during their search process, and then spent two years locating an acquisition. Offers unique opportunities to value a business and explore fundraising opportunities. In addition, provides motivation for MBAs interested in going into business for themselves directly out of the MBA program.

Case Authors : H. Irving Grousbeck, David Dodson

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Financial analysis, Mergers & acquisitions

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Kirk Riedinger and Jamie Turner Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015892)	-10015892	-	-
Year 1	3462262	-6553630	3462262	0.9434	3266285
Year 2	3970773	-2582857	7433035	0.89	3533974
Year 3	3955404	1372547	11388439	0.8396	3321033
Year 4	3249287	4621834	14637726	0.7921	2573740
TOTAL			14637726		12695032

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2679140

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Kirk Jamie shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Kirk Jamie have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Kirk Riedinger and Jamie Turner

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Kirk Jamie often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Kirk Jamie needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015892)	-10015892	-	-
Year 1	3462262	-6553630	3462262	0.8696	3010663
Year 2	3970773	-2582857	7433035	0.7561	3002475
Year 3	3955404	1372547	11388439	0.6575	2600742
Year 4	3249287	4621834	14637726	0.5718	1857790
TOTAL					10471670

The Net NPV after 4 years is 455778

(10471670 - 10015892 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015892)	-10015892	-	-
Year 1	3462262	-6553630	3462262	0.8333	2885218
Year 2	3970773	-2582857	7433035	0.6944	2757481
Year 3	3955404	1372547	11388439	0.5787	2289007
Year 4	3249287	4621834	14637726	0.4823	1566979
TOTAL					9498685

The Net NPV after 4 years is -517207

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9498685 - 10015892 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Kirk Jamie to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Kirk Jamie has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Kirk Jamie can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Kirk Jamie, then the stock price of the Kirk Jamie should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Kirk Jamie should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Kirk Riedinger and Jamie Turner

References & Further Readings

H. Irving Grousbeck, David Dodson (2018), "Kirk Riedinger and Jamie Turner Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.