Stanford and Silicon Valley: Lessons on Becoming a High-Tech Region Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Stanford and Silicon Valley: Lessons on Becoming a High-Tech Region case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Stanford and Silicon Valley: Lessons on Becoming a High-Tech Region case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Stephen B. Adams. The Stanford and Silicon Valley: Lessons on Becoming a High-Tech Region (referred as “Valley's Tech” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, IT, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Stanford and Silicon Valley: Lessons on Becoming a High-Tech Region Case Study

What role should the academic anchor play in the development of a high-tech region? Based on analysis of historical data and archival documents, this article explores the question by looking at the relationship between Stanford University and Silicon Valley, the quintessential high-tech entrepreneurial region. During the Valley's crucial formative years (1945-1965), Stanford had four principal local business community outreach programs. In each case, Stanford's default mode of industrial outreach was to seek satellite operations of established firms based elsewhere (such as Lockheed), whereas its assistance to indigenous firms (and start-ups) was ancillary at best. For those trying to establish a high-tech region elsewhere, the lesson may be not to try to replicate Silicon Valley's contemporary university-industry relationship and the central role of entrepreneurship. The Valley's formative years offer a different model for the contributions of an academic anchor to the development of a high-tech region.

Case Authors : Stephen B. Adams

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : IT, Strategy

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Stanford and Silicon Valley: Lessons on Becoming a High-Tech Region Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10014016)	-10014016	-	-
Year 1	3444104	-6569912	3444104	0.9434	3249155
Year 2	3976311	-2593601	7420415	0.89	3538903
Year 3	3957378	1363777	11377793	0.8396	3322691
Year 4	3248138	4611915	14625931	0.7921	2572830
TOTAL			14625931		12683578

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2669562

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Valley's Tech have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Valley's Tech shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Stanford and Silicon Valley: Lessons on Becoming a High-Tech Region

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Valley's Tech often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Valley's Tech needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10014016)	-10014016	-	-
Year 1	3444104	-6569912	3444104	0.8696	2994873
Year 2	3976311	-2593601	7420415	0.7561	3006662
Year 3	3957378	1363777	11377793	0.6575	2602040
Year 4	3248138	4611915	14625931	0.5718	1857133
TOTAL					10460709

The Net NPV after 4 years is 446693

(10460709 - 10014016 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10014016)	-10014016	-	-
Year 1	3444104	-6569912	3444104	0.8333	2870087
Year 2	3976311	-2593601	7420415	0.6944	2761327
Year 3	3957378	1363777	11377793	0.5787	2290149
Year 4	3248138	4611915	14625931	0.4823	1566425
TOTAL					9487988

The Net NPV after 4 years is -526028

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487988 - 10014016 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Valley's Tech to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Valley's Tech has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Valley's Tech can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Valley's Tech, then the stock price of the Valley's Tech should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Valley's Tech should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Stanford and Silicon Valley: Lessons on Becoming a High-Tech Region

References & Further Readings

Stephen B. Adams (2018), "Stanford and Silicon Valley: Lessons on Becoming a High-Tech Region Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.