×




Hambrecht & Quist (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Hambrecht & Quist (B) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Hambrecht & Quist (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Thomas J. DeLong, Nicole Tempest. The Hambrecht & Quist (B) (referred as “Quist Hambrecht” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Mergers & acquisitions, Organizational culture, Talent management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Hambrecht & Quist (B) Case Study


Supplements the (A) case.


Case Authors : Thomas J. DeLong, Nicole Tempest

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Mergers & acquisitions, Organizational culture, Talent management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Hambrecht & Quist (B) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028783) -10028783 - -
Year 1 3445166 -6583617 3445166 0.9434 3250157
Year 2 3962531 -2621086 7407697 0.89 3526638
Year 3 3962364 1341278 11370061 0.8396 3326877
Year 4 3234298 4575576 14604359 0.7921 2561867
TOTAL 14604359 12665539




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2636756

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Quist Hambrecht shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Quist Hambrecht have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Hambrecht & Quist (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Quist Hambrecht often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Quist Hambrecht needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028783) -10028783 - -
Year 1 3445166 -6583617 3445166 0.8696 2995797
Year 2 3962531 -2621086 7407697 0.7561 2996243
Year 3 3962364 1341278 11370061 0.6575 2605319
Year 4 3234298 4575576 14604359 0.5718 1849220
TOTAL 10446578


The Net NPV after 4 years is 417795

(10446578 - 10028783 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028783) -10028783 - -
Year 1 3445166 -6583617 3445166 0.8333 2870972
Year 2 3962531 -2621086 7407697 0.6944 2751758
Year 3 3962364 1341278 11370061 0.5787 2293035
Year 4 3234298 4575576 14604359 0.4823 1559750
TOTAL 9475514


The Net NPV after 4 years is -553269

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9475514 - 10028783 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Quist Hambrecht to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Quist Hambrecht has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Quist Hambrecht can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Quist Hambrecht, then the stock price of the Quist Hambrecht should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Quist Hambrecht should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Hambrecht & Quist (B)

References & Further Readings

Thomas J. DeLong, Nicole Tempest (2018), "Hambrecht & Quist (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Westwing Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


EGL SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Personal Services


Zungwon EN-Sys SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Min Xin Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Sansheng SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Zhongnan Heavy A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Yoke Technology A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Polar Power SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Tel Pacific Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Solocal SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Investors Title SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)