×




Doing Right, Investing Right: Socially Responsible Investing and Shareholder Activism in the Financial Sector Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Doing Right, Investing Right: Socially Responsible Investing and Shareholder Activism in the Financial Sector case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Doing Right, Investing Right: Socially Responsible Investing and Shareholder Activism in the Financial Sector case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Chang Hoon Oh, Jae-Heum Park, Pervez N. Ghauri. The Doing Right, Investing Right: Socially Responsible Investing and Shareholder Activism in the Financial Sector (referred as “Activism Socially” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial markets, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Doing Right, Investing Right: Socially Responsible Investing and Shareholder Activism in the Financial Sector Case Study


In this article, we present an overview of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the financial sector. We focus on how socially responsible investment and shareholder activism have been integral parts of corporate social responsibility in the financial sector. We examine how the financial sector and its firms are evaluated and rated via a sustainability index, the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index, and show that even leading financial institutions do not employ proactive practices regarding socially responsible investment and shareholder activism. Finally, we provide examples of two companies, UBS AG and the Co-operative Banking Group, that do utilize proactive practices.


Case Authors : Chang Hoon Oh, Jae-Heum Park, Pervez N. Ghauri

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial markets, Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Doing Right, Investing Right: Socially Responsible Investing and Shareholder Activism in the Financial Sector Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011301) -10011301 - -
Year 1 3449547 -6561754 3449547 0.9434 3254290
Year 2 3955128 -2606626 7404675 0.89 3520050
Year 3 3957562 1350936 11362237 0.8396 3322845
Year 4 3234166 4585102 14596403 0.7921 2561762
TOTAL 14596403 12658947




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2647646

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Activism Socially have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Activism Socially shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Doing Right, Investing Right: Socially Responsible Investing and Shareholder Activism in the Financial Sector

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Activism Socially often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Activism Socially needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011301) -10011301 - -
Year 1 3449547 -6561754 3449547 0.8696 2999606
Year 2 3955128 -2606626 7404675 0.7561 2990645
Year 3 3957562 1350936 11362237 0.6575 2602161
Year 4 3234166 4585102 14596403 0.5718 1849145
TOTAL 10441557


The Net NPV after 4 years is 430256

(10441557 - 10011301 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011301) -10011301 - -
Year 1 3449547 -6561754 3449547 0.8333 2874623
Year 2 3955128 -2606626 7404675 0.6944 2746617
Year 3 3957562 1350936 11362237 0.5787 2290256
Year 4 3234166 4585102 14596403 0.4823 1559687
TOTAL 9471181


The Net NPV after 4 years is -540120

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9471181 - 10011301 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Activism Socially to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Activism Socially has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Activism Socially can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Activism Socially, then the stock price of the Activism Socially should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Activism Socially should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Doing Right, Investing Right: Socially Responsible Investing and Shareholder Activism in the Financial Sector

References & Further Readings

Chang Hoon Oh, Jae-Heum Park, Pervez N. Ghauri (2018), "Doing Right, Investing Right: Socially Responsible Investing and Shareholder Activism in the Financial Sector Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


KT Music SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Seek SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Pan Brothers SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Orient Securities SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Kaji Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Mahin Ugine SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel


Being SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Neometals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Ki-Star Real Estate SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services