×




Montague Corp. (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Montague Corp. (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Montague Corp. (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Norman A. Berg, James Weber. The Montague Corp. (A) (referred as “Montague David” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, International business, Marketing, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Montague Corp. (A) Case Study


The Montague Corp. is a small company started in 1987 and owned by David Montague, age 31, and his father. The company designs, manufactures in Taiwan, and sells through distributors worldwide a high-quality "bicycle that folds." The company offices are located in Cambridge, Mass., and the company has only five other employees, all younger than David. The company has been financed internally and is cash-rich at the present rate of growth. About 90% of sales are foreign, as is all of the manufacturing.


Case Authors : Norman A. Berg, James Weber

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Financial management, International business, Marketing, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Montague Corp. (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020711) -10020711 - -
Year 1 3455847 -6564864 3455847 0.9434 3260233
Year 2 3978696 -2586168 7434543 0.89 3541025
Year 3 3957036 1370868 11391579 0.8396 3322404
Year 4 3226003 4596871 14617582 0.7921 2555297
TOTAL 14617582 12678959




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2658248

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Montague David have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Montague David shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Montague Corp. (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Montague David often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Montague David needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020711) -10020711 - -
Year 1 3455847 -6564864 3455847 0.8696 3005084
Year 2 3978696 -2586168 7434543 0.7561 3008466
Year 3 3957036 1370868 11391579 0.6575 2601815
Year 4 3226003 4596871 14617582 0.5718 1844478
TOTAL 10459843


The Net NPV after 4 years is 439132

(10459843 - 10020711 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020711) -10020711 - -
Year 1 3455847 -6564864 3455847 0.8333 2879873
Year 2 3978696 -2586168 7434543 0.6944 2762983
Year 3 3957036 1370868 11391579 0.5787 2289951
Year 4 3226003 4596871 14617582 0.4823 1555750
TOTAL 9488557


The Net NPV after 4 years is -532154

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488557 - 10020711 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Montague David to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Montague David has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Montague David can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Montague David, then the stock price of the Montague David should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Montague David should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Montague Corp. (A)

References & Further Readings

Norman A. Berg, James Weber (2018), "Montague Corp. (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Grillit, Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock


Gridsum SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


CPI Aerostructures SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Horizon Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Alco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


OSB SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


KG Intelligence SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


Mcphy Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods