×




Yieldex (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Yieldex (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Yieldex (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Toby Stuart, Alison Berkley Wagonfeld. The Yieldex (A) (referred as “Cosman Yieldex” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Decision making, Entrepreneurial management, Mergers & acquisitions, Technology, Venture capital.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Yieldex (A) Case Study


Yieldex Founder, Doug Cosman, is faced with the decision to sell his young software start-up for $4 million or to hire a CEO (Tom Shields) and pursue Series A venture capital financing. His angel investors and CEO candidate Tom Shields believe he should reject the offer and focus on building the company into a bigger enterprise. Cosman is attracted to the financial rewards offered by the potential acquirer.


Case Authors : Toby Stuart, Alison Berkley Wagonfeld

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Decision making, Entrepreneurial management, Mergers & acquisitions, Technology, Venture capital




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Yieldex (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005725) -10005725 - -
Year 1 3469616 -6536109 3469616 0.9434 3273223
Year 2 3982422 -2553687 7452038 0.89 3544341
Year 3 3950295 1396608 11402333 0.8396 3316744
Year 4 3239342 4635950 14641675 0.7921 2565862
TOTAL 14641675 12700170




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2694445

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Cosman Yieldex shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Cosman Yieldex have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Yieldex (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Cosman Yieldex often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Cosman Yieldex needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005725) -10005725 - -
Year 1 3469616 -6536109 3469616 0.8696 3017057
Year 2 3982422 -2553687 7452038 0.7561 3011283
Year 3 3950295 1396608 11402333 0.6575 2597383
Year 4 3239342 4635950 14641675 0.5718 1852104
TOTAL 10477828


The Net NPV after 4 years is 472103

(10477828 - 10005725 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005725) -10005725 - -
Year 1 3469616 -6536109 3469616 0.8333 2891347
Year 2 3982422 -2553687 7452038 0.6944 2765571
Year 3 3950295 1396608 11402333 0.5787 2286050
Year 4 3239342 4635950 14641675 0.4823 1562183
TOTAL 9505151


The Net NPV after 4 years is -500574

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9505151 - 10005725 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Cosman Yieldex to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Cosman Yieldex has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Cosman Yieldex can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Cosman Yieldex, then the stock price of the Cosman Yieldex should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Cosman Yieldex should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Yieldex (A)

References & Further Readings

Toby Stuart, Alison Berkley Wagonfeld (2018), "Yieldex (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Mintye Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Afcon Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Caterpillar SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Sqn Secured Income SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


CSG Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Hengtong Optic Electric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Gamesa SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Mercantile SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Chuco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


Meritz Financi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)