Sustainability: How Stakeholder Perceptions Differ from Corporate Reality Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Sustainability: How Stakeholder Perceptions Differ from Corporate Reality case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Sustainability: How Stakeholder Perceptions Differ from Corporate Reality case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John Peloza, Moritz Loock, James Cerruti, Michael Muyot. The Sustainability: How Stakeholder Perceptions Differ from Corporate Reality (referred as “Sustainability Perceptions” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Corporate communications, Corporate governance, Social responsibility, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Sustainability: How Stakeholder Perceptions Differ from Corporate Reality Case Study

A strong reputation is widely acknowledged to be the most valuable asset of a firm, and sustainability has become an important component of corporate reputation. Many stakeholders, from customers to investors to employees to purchasing managers, report that sustainability is an important factor in their decision-making processes. However, sustainability messages have become ubiquitous-almost table stakes-for most large firms. In such an active marketplace, especially for firms who have not pursued leadership positions, it is difficult for companies to use sustainability to create meaningful differentiation from competitors and thus benefit from their investments. There is often a major gap between stakeholder perceptions and firm performance. Firms that integrate sustainability into their culture and business practices are better able to integrate sustainability messaging into mainstream communications

Case Authors : John Peloza, Moritz Loock, James Cerruti, Michael Muyot

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Corporate communications, Corporate governance, Social responsibility, Sustainability

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Sustainability: How Stakeholder Perceptions Differ from Corporate Reality Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10017255)	-10017255	-	-
Year 1	3443440	-6573815	3443440	0.9434	3248528
Year 2	3978120	-2595695	7421560	0.89	3540513
Year 3	3970896	1375201	11392456	0.8396	3334041
Year 4	3227864	4603065	14620320	0.7921	2556771
TOTAL			14620320		12679852

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2662597

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Sustainability Perceptions shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Sustainability Perceptions have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Sustainability: How Stakeholder Perceptions Differ from Corporate Reality

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Sustainability Perceptions often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Sustainability Perceptions needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10017255)	-10017255	-	-
Year 1	3443440	-6573815	3443440	0.8696	2994296
Year 2	3978120	-2595695	7421560	0.7561	3008030
Year 3	3970896	1375201	11392456	0.6575	2610929
Year 4	3227864	4603065	14620320	0.5718	1845542
TOTAL					10458796

The Net NPV after 4 years is 441541

(10458796 - 10017255 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10017255)	-10017255	-	-
Year 1	3443440	-6573815	3443440	0.8333	2869533
Year 2	3978120	-2595695	7421560	0.6944	2762583
Year 3	3970896	1375201	11392456	0.5787	2297972
Year 4	3227864	4603065	14620320	0.4823	1556647
TOTAL					9486736

The Net NPV after 4 years is -530519

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9486736 - 10017255 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Sustainability Perceptions to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Sustainability Perceptions has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Sustainability Perceptions can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Sustainability Perceptions, then the stock price of the Sustainability Perceptions should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Sustainability Perceptions should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Sustainability: How Stakeholder Perceptions Differ from Corporate Reality

References & Further Readings

John Peloza, Moritz Loock, James Cerruti, Michael Muyot (2018), "Sustainability: How Stakeholder Perceptions Differ from Corporate Reality Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.