×




Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mary Jo Bitner, Amy L. Ostrom, Felicia N Morgan. The Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation (referred as “Blueprinting Service” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Customers, Innovation.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation Case Study


With the global focus on service-led growth has come increased need for practical techniques for service innovation. Services are fluid, dynamic, experiential, and frequently co-produced in real time by customers, employees, and technology, often with few static physical properties. However, most product innovation approaches focus on the design of relatively static products with physical properties. Thus, many of the invention and prototype design techniques used for physical goods and technologies do not work well for human and interactive services. This article describes one technique-service blueprinting-that has proven useful for service innovation. Service blueprinting is securely grounded in the customer's experience and it allows the clear visualization of dynamic service processes. The technique is described in detail including real case examples that illustrate the value and breadth of its applications.


Case Authors : Mary Jo Bitner, Amy L. Ostrom, Felicia N Morgan

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Customers, Innovation




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005193) -10005193 - -
Year 1 3443508 -6561685 3443508 0.9434 3248592
Year 2 3964761 -2596924 7408269 0.89 3528623
Year 3 3963341 1366417 11371610 0.8396 3327698
Year 4 3244972 4611389 14616582 0.7921 2570322
TOTAL 14616582 12675235




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2670042

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Blueprinting Service shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Blueprinting Service have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Blueprinting Service often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Blueprinting Service needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005193) -10005193 - -
Year 1 3443508 -6561685 3443508 0.8696 2994355
Year 2 3964761 -2596924 7408269 0.7561 2997929
Year 3 3963341 1366417 11371610 0.6575 2605961
Year 4 3244972 4611389 14616582 0.5718 1855323
TOTAL 10453568


The Net NPV after 4 years is 448375

(10453568 - 10005193 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005193) -10005193 - -
Year 1 3443508 -6561685 3443508 0.8333 2869590
Year 2 3964761 -2596924 7408269 0.6944 2753306
Year 3 3963341 1366417 11371610 0.5787 2293600
Year 4 3244972 4611389 14616582 0.4823 1564898
TOTAL 9481394


The Net NPV after 4 years is -523799

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9481394 - 10005193 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Blueprinting Service to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Blueprinting Service has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Blueprinting Service can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Blueprinting Service, then the stock price of the Blueprinting Service should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Blueprinting Service should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation

References & Further Readings

Mary Jo Bitner, Amy L. Ostrom, Felicia N Morgan (2018), "Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Centuria Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Prelios SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Paraca Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Bigblu Broadband SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services