×




Founders Fund Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Founders Fund case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Founders Fund case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Bethany Coates, John Glynn. The Founders Fund (referred as “Fund Ff” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Founders Fund Case Study


For Sean Parker, a managing partner at Founders Fund (FF), a San Francisco-based venture capital (VC) firm, November 2007 was a critical moment in the process of raising the firm's second fund. As he prepared to describe FF's nontraditional strategy to a potential limited partner (LP) in San Francisco's Financial District, he decided to focus on what distinguished Founders Fund from the sea of VC firms in Silicon Valley, how it was innovating within a mature industry, and why it would be the most successful fund in history. Since its inception in 2005, Founders Fund had attracted substantial publicity. Though most had been positive, Parker nevertheless wanted to address a few of the critiques that had surfaced within the industry press. He hoped to be persuasive-FF wanted to close the $150-million round before the end of the month.


Case Authors : Bethany Coates, John Glynn

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Founders Fund Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018306) -10018306 - -
Year 1 3460997 -6557309 3460997 0.9434 3265092
Year 2 3980971 -2576338 7441968 0.89 3543050
Year 3 3969075 1392737 11411043 0.8396 3332512
Year 4 3241548 4634285 14652591 0.7921 2567610
TOTAL 14652591 12708263




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2689957

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Fund Ff have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Fund Ff shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Founders Fund

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Fund Ff often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Fund Ff needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018306) -10018306 - -
Year 1 3460997 -6557309 3460997 0.8696 3009563
Year 2 3980971 -2576338 7441968 0.7561 3010186
Year 3 3969075 1392737 11411043 0.6575 2609731
Year 4 3241548 4634285 14652591 0.5718 1853366
TOTAL 10482845


The Net NPV after 4 years is 464539

(10482845 - 10018306 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018306) -10018306 - -
Year 1 3460997 -6557309 3460997 0.8333 2884164
Year 2 3980971 -2576338 7441968 0.6944 2764563
Year 3 3969075 1392737 11411043 0.5787 2296918
Year 4 3241548 4634285 14652591 0.4823 1563247
TOTAL 9508892


The Net NPV after 4 years is -509414

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9508892 - 10018306 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Fund Ff to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Fund Ff has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Fund Ff can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Fund Ff, then the stock price of the Fund Ff should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Fund Ff should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Founders Fund

References & Further Readings

Bethany Coates, John Glynn (2018), "Founders Fund Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


W.S. Industries India Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Befesa SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Trucking


Artprice Com SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Nuance Communications SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Yokowo Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Sirius Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Life)


Medpace Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Sumitomo Riko SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Nimble SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


Aveva SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Codan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.