×




The Nature Conservancy: Advocating for and Investing in Sustainable Water Management Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Nature Conservancy: Advocating for and Investing in Sustainable Water Management case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Nature Conservancy: Advocating for and Investing in Sustainable Water Management case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Peter Debaere, Brian Richter. The The Nature Conservancy: Advocating for and Investing in Sustainable Water Management (referred as “Tnc Water” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Nature Conservancy: Advocating for and Investing in Sustainable Water Management Case Study


The Nature Conservancy (TNC) was one of the largest conservation organizations in the world; its mission was to "to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends." Over time, TNC had expanded its mission to include advocating for sustainable water-management practices, and its numerous water specialists had advised corporations, water ministries, legislatures, and many other organizations. TNC was constantly exploring new ways of advocating sustainable water use and weighing its options to engage new opportunities. Brian Richter, a veteran scientist for TNC who had led its water market strategy for the past few years, was convinced that water markets could be attractive for the market-friendly TNC. But he wondered how TNC could integrate water markets into its water strategy while staying true to its legacy and mission. This case includes an interview with TNC's Brian Richter about some of the tools TNC had at its disposal to realize its conservationist objectives.


Case Authors : Peter Debaere, Brian Richter

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Nature Conservancy: Advocating for and Investing in Sustainable Water Management Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021898) -10021898 - -
Year 1 3465050 -6556848 3465050 0.9434 3268915
Year 2 3975868 -2580980 7440918 0.89 3538508
Year 3 3948526 1367546 11389444 0.8396 3315259
Year 4 3231961 4599507 14621405 0.7921 2560016
TOTAL 14621405 12682698




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2660800

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Tnc Water shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Tnc Water have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Nature Conservancy: Advocating for and Investing in Sustainable Water Management

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Tnc Water often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Tnc Water needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021898) -10021898 - -
Year 1 3465050 -6556848 3465050 0.8696 3013087
Year 2 3975868 -2580980 7440918 0.7561 3006327
Year 3 3948526 1367546 11389444 0.6575 2596220
Year 4 3231961 4599507 14621405 0.5718 1847884
TOTAL 10463518


The Net NPV after 4 years is 441620

(10463518 - 10021898 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021898) -10021898 - -
Year 1 3465050 -6556848 3465050 0.8333 2887542
Year 2 3975868 -2580980 7440918 0.6944 2761019
Year 3 3948526 1367546 11389444 0.5787 2285027
Year 4 3231961 4599507 14621405 0.4823 1558623
TOTAL 9492211


The Net NPV after 4 years is -529687

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9492211 - 10021898 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Tnc Water to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Tnc Water has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Tnc Water can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Tnc Water, then the stock price of the Tnc Water should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Tnc Water should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Nature Conservancy: Advocating for and Investing in Sustainable Water Management

References & Further Readings

Peter Debaere, Brian Richter (2018), "The Nature Conservancy: Advocating for and Investing in Sustainable Water Management Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Affymax, Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


ICON PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Mobileleader SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Adcorp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Telecom Italia A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Shandong Gettop Acoustic A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Daiken Medical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies