Hillary Clinton & Partners: Leading Global Social Change from the US State Department Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Hillary Clinton & Partners: Leading Global Social Change from the US State Department case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Hillary Clinton & Partners: Leading Global Social Change from the US State Department case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Ai-Ling Jamila Malone. The Hillary Clinton & Partners: Leading Global Social Change from the US State Department (referred as “Clinton Hillary” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Diversity, Innovation, International business, Joint ventures, Leadership, Recession, Reorganization.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Hillary Clinton & Partners: Leading Global Social Change from the US State Department Case Study

As U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton acted on a long-standing interest in public-private partnerships to elevate and activate an Office of Global Partnerships reporting directly to her. One major initiative that also addressed her interest in women's empowerment was to create an alliance for clean cookstoves, a significant environmental and public health issue in developing countries. This case examines the change process within the State Department and across the federal government as well as the process of developing partnerships, and looks at what happens on the ground to deploy resources. It raises the question of whether the alliances will be sustainable when Sec. Clinton leaves office.

Case Authors : Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Ai-Ling Jamila Malone

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Diversity, Innovation, International business, Joint ventures, Leadership, Recession, Reorganization

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Hillary Clinton & Partners: Leading Global Social Change from the US State Department Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012156)	-10012156	-	-
Year 1	3460994	-6551162	3460994	0.9434	3265089
Year 2	3976883	-2574279	7437877	0.89	3539412
Year 3	3970452	1396173	11408329	0.8396	3333668
Year 4	3251867	4648040	14660196	0.7921	2575783
TOTAL			14660196		12713952

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2701796

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Clinton Hillary have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Clinton Hillary shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Hillary Clinton & Partners: Leading Global Social Change from the US State Department

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Clinton Hillary often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Clinton Hillary needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012156)	-10012156	-	-
Year 1	3460994	-6551162	3460994	0.8696	3009560
Year 2	3976883	-2574279	7437877	0.7561	3007095
Year 3	3970452	1396173	11408329	0.6575	2610637
Year 4	3251867	4648040	14660196	0.5718	1859266
TOTAL					10486557

The Net NPV after 4 years is 474401

(10486557 - 10012156 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012156)	-10012156	-	-
Year 1	3460994	-6551162	3460994	0.8333	2884162
Year 2	3976883	-2574279	7437877	0.6944	2761724
Year 3	3970452	1396173	11408329	0.5787	2297715
Year 4	3251867	4648040	14660196	0.4823	1568223
TOTAL					9511824

The Net NPV after 4 years is -500332

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9511824 - 10012156 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Clinton Hillary to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Clinton Hillary has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Clinton Hillary can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Clinton Hillary, then the stock price of the Clinton Hillary should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Clinton Hillary should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Hillary Clinton & Partners: Leading Global Social Change from the US State Department

References & Further Readings

Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Ai-Ling Jamila Malone (2018), "Hillary Clinton & Partners: Leading Global Social Change from the US State Department Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.