Suncor's Political Role in Fort McMurray Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Suncor's Political Role in Fort McMurray case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Suncor's Political Role in Fort McMurray case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael Valente. The Suncor's Political Role in Fort McMurray (referred as “Mcmurray Fort” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Government.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Suncor's Political Role in Fort McMurray Case Study

In the midst of massive growth in the oil sands, Suncor's chief executive officer (CEO) is growing concerned about the local government's inability to cope with unprecedented growth of oils sands development in Fort McMurray, Alberta. Crime, prostitution, drug use, social inequality and ecological deterioration have begun to cripple Fort McMurray and the surrounding area largely because the local government has been unable to support the massive growth with appropriate public services and environmental protection. As part of a major oil and gas company in the region, the CEO is aware of the harsh lessons learned by Shell in Nigeria in 1995, where the company's reluctance to get involved in political activities led to a massive boycott and tarnished reputation. The CEO is concerned that inaction may hold Suncor complicit in the social and ecological issues in the region. The case illustrates the need for companies to take on political responsibilities, in this case through the active engagement of addressing public service gaps. Written for courses in business and society, stakeholder engagement, public administration, public-private partnerships, strategic management, and negotiations, the case chronicles the motivations of companies such as Suncor to address public service gaps to avoid negative impacts on the firm. Students engage in a role-play representing six different stakeholders, the objective of which is to begin a process of engagement to collectively address the social and ecological issues plaguing the region. The case helps students recognize the growing prevalence of private sector involvement in political affairs and the difference between stakeholder management of and stakeholder engagement with seemingly adversarial stakeholders, the latter of which is critical to collaboratively respond to the complexity of sustainable development.

Case Authors : Michael Valente

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Government

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Suncor's Political Role in Fort McMurray Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10007497)	-10007497	-	-
Year 1	3470290	-6537207	3470290	0.9434	3273858
Year 2	3970837	-2566370	7441127	0.89	3534031
Year 3	3967646	1401276	11408773	0.8396	3331312
Year 4	3238446	4639722	14647219	0.7921	2565153
TOTAL			14647219		12704354

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2696857

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Mcmurray Fort have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Mcmurray Fort shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Suncor's Political Role in Fort McMurray

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Mcmurray Fort often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Mcmurray Fort needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10007497)	-10007497	-	-
Year 1	3470290	-6537207	3470290	0.8696	3017643
Year 2	3970837	-2566370	7441127	0.7561	3002523
Year 3	3967646	1401276	11408773	0.6575	2608792
Year 4	3238446	4639722	14647219	0.5718	1851592
TOTAL					10480550

The Net NPV after 4 years is 473053

(10480550 - 10007497 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10007497)	-10007497	-	-
Year 1	3470290	-6537207	3470290	0.8333	2891908
Year 2	3970837	-2566370	7441127	0.6944	2757526
Year 3	3967646	1401276	11408773	0.5787	2296091
Year 4	3238446	4639722	14647219	0.4823	1561751
TOTAL					9507276

The Net NPV after 4 years is -500221

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9507276 - 10007497 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Mcmurray Fort to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Mcmurray Fort has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Mcmurray Fort can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Mcmurray Fort, then the stock price of the Mcmurray Fort should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Mcmurray Fort should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Suncor's Political Role in Fort McMurray

References & Further Readings

Michael Valente (2018), "Suncor's Political Role in Fort McMurray Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.