Wiwa v. Royal Dutch/Shell Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Wiwa v. Royal Dutch/Shell case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Wiwa v. Royal Dutch/Shell case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Lynn Sharp Paine, Lara Adamsons. The Wiwa v. Royal Dutch/Shell (referred as “Wiwa Shell” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, International business, Operations management, Regulation, Transparency.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of Wiwa v. Royal Dutch/Shell Case Study

On the eve of trial, and after nearly 14 years of pre-trial litigation, the parties in Wiwa v. Royal Dutch/Shell jointly announced that the four U.S. lawsuits stemming from the execution of the Ogoni Nine in 1995 had been settled. Recommended for use with [399126], [399127], [399129], [300039], and [300040].

Case Authors : Lynn Sharp Paine, Lara Adamsons

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : International business, Operations management, Regulation, Transparency

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Wiwa v. Royal Dutch/Shell Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024630) -10024630 - -
Year 1 3470417 -6554213 3470417 0.9434 3273978
Year 2 3965248 -2588965 7435665 0.89 3529057
Year 3 3939724 1350759 11375389 0.8396 3307868
Year 4 3236168 4586927 14611557 0.7921 2563348
TOTAL 14611557 12674251

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2649621

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Wiwa Shell have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Wiwa Shell shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Wiwa v. Royal Dutch/Shell

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Wiwa Shell often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Wiwa Shell needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024630) -10024630 - -
Year 1 3470417 -6554213 3470417 0.8696 3017754
Year 2 3965248 -2588965 7435665 0.7561 2998297
Year 3 3939724 1350759 11375389 0.6575 2590432
Year 4 3236168 4586927 14611557 0.5718 1850290
TOTAL 10456773

The Net NPV after 4 years is 432143

(10456773 - 10024630 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024630) -10024630 - -
Year 1 3470417 -6554213 3470417 0.8333 2892014
Year 2 3965248 -2588965 7435665 0.6944 2753644
Year 3 3939724 1350759 11375389 0.5787 2279933
Year 4 3236168 4586927 14611557 0.4823 1560652
TOTAL 9486243

The Net NPV after 4 years is -538387

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9486243 - 10024630 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Wiwa Shell to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Wiwa Shell has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Wiwa Shell can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Wiwa Shell, then the stock price of the Wiwa Shell should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Wiwa Shell should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

Negotiation Strategy of Wiwa v. Royal Dutch/Shell

References & Further Readings

Lynn Sharp Paine, Lara Adamsons (2018), "Wiwa v. Royal Dutch/Shell Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.

Proteomics Intl Labs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs

Dongwon Ind SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing

Regal SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Footwear

Samyang Optics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Photography

Mecelec SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls

Superlon Holdings Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool

Yueling A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts

Scnc App In SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming

Hexin Industry A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber

JPMorgan Brazil Inv Trust SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services