×




Adapting to Climate Change: The Case of Suncor Energy and the Alberta Oil Sands Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Adapting to Climate Change: The Case of Suncor Energy and the Alberta Oil Sands case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Adapting to Climate Change: The Case of Suncor Energy and the Alberta Oil Sands case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Pratima Bansal, Jijun Gao. The Adapting to Climate Change: The Case of Suncor Energy and the Alberta Oil Sands (referred as “Suncor Interaction” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial analysis, Financial management, Government, International business, Managing uncertainty, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Adapting to Climate Change: The Case of Suncor Energy and the Alberta Oil Sands Case Study


The chief executive officer of an oil and gas company must decide whether he wants to invest heavily in reducing greenhouse gases. Specifically, Suncor Energy must evaluate whether it should invest $425 million in carbon capture and storage or wait until there is greater certainty in the political, social and business environment. The case will help students develop skills of analyzing business decisions under higher environmental uncertainty, especially when the outcome is a long-term goal. Further, the issues presented in the case open up discussions about climate change and the interaction between business actions and societal expectations. There is also an opportunity to speak about the interaction between business and public policy.


Case Authors : Pratima Bansal, Jijun Gao

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Financial analysis, Financial management, Government, International business, Managing uncertainty, Sustainability




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Adapting to Climate Change: The Case of Suncor Energy and the Alberta Oil Sands Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015643) -10015643 - -
Year 1 3453553 -6562090 3453553 0.9434 3258069
Year 2 3957766 -2604324 7411319 0.89 3522398
Year 3 3945956 1341632 11357275 0.8396 3313101
Year 4 3246078 4587710 14603353 0.7921 2571198
TOTAL 14603353 12664765




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2649122

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Suncor Interaction shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Suncor Interaction have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Adapting to Climate Change: The Case of Suncor Energy and the Alberta Oil Sands

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Suncor Interaction often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Suncor Interaction needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015643) -10015643 - -
Year 1 3453553 -6562090 3453553 0.8696 3003090
Year 2 3957766 -2604324 7411319 0.7561 2992640
Year 3 3945956 1341632 11357275 0.6575 2594530
Year 4 3246078 4587710 14603353 0.5718 1855956
TOTAL 10446215


The Net NPV after 4 years is 430572

(10446215 - 10015643 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015643) -10015643 - -
Year 1 3453553 -6562090 3453553 0.8333 2877961
Year 2 3957766 -2604324 7411319 0.6944 2748449
Year 3 3945956 1341632 11357275 0.5787 2283539
Year 4 3246078 4587710 14603353 0.4823 1565431
TOTAL 9475380


The Net NPV after 4 years is -540263

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9475380 - 10015643 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Suncor Interaction to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Suncor Interaction has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Suncor Interaction can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Suncor Interaction, then the stock price of the Suncor Interaction should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Suncor Interaction should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Adapting to Climate Change: The Case of Suncor Energy and the Alberta Oil Sands

References & Further Readings

Pratima Bansal, Jijun Gao (2018), "Adapting to Climate Change: The Case of Suncor Energy and the Alberta Oil Sands Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Zhongmin Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


Barakah Offshore Petroleum SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Ensign Energy Services SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Brompton Split Banc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Chuan Huat Res SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Shenzhen Sea Star Technology SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures